After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 357564 - crash in Epiphany Web Bookmarks: Started Epiphany as soon...
crash in Epiphany Web Bookmarks: Started Epiphany as soon...
Status: RESOLVED NOTGNOME
Product: epiphany
Classification: Core
Component: General
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Epiphany Maintainers
Marco Pesenti Gritti
: 351151 367171 368722 412637 423233 425222 481162 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-09-25 07:12 UTC by Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail)
Modified: 2007-09-28 11:27 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2006-09-25 07:12:31 UTC 
Version: 2.16.0

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Started Epiphany as soon as I logged into GNOME.

Had Gaim open, and Liferea loading.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 61980672 vsize: 0 resident: 61980672 share: 0 rss: 27340800 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1159168250 rtime: 0 utime: 154 stime: 0 cutime:138 cstime: 0 timeout: 16 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/epiphany'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1228220752 (LWP 4433)]
[New Thread -1250206816 (LWP 4445)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 73177

Thread 1 (Thread -1228220752 (LWP 4433))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #2 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    at gnome-ui-init.c line 874
  • #3 gtk_moz_embed_get_title
    from /usr/lib/firefox/libgtkembedmoz.so
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #6 *__GI_raise
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #7 *__GI_abort
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #8 IA__g_logv
  • #9 IA__g_log
  • #10 IA__g_assert_warning
    at gmessages.c line 552
  • #11 dbus_g_proxy_new_for_name
    from /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.2
  • #12 IA__g_hash_table_foreach
    at ghash.c line 662
  • #13 dbus_g_proxy_set_interface
    from /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.2
  • #14 dbus_connection_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.3
  • #15 dbus_server_setup_with_g_main
    from /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.2
  • #16 IA__g_main_context_dispatch
    at gmain.c line 2045
  • #17 g_main_context_iterate
    at gmain.c line 2677
  • #18 IA__g_main_loop_run
    at gmain.c line 2881
  • #19 IA__gtk_main
    at gtkmain.c line 1024
  • #20 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 






Comment 1


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-09-25 11:17:46 UTC
        



Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


Matches the stacktrace in bug 351151, which is a duplicate of bug 348421.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 348421 ***






Comment 2


Christian Persch





          2006-09-25 12:57:18 UTC
        



Actually while the trace is very similar, the assertion that's failing is a different one: 





+
Trace
    73193






    

  • 
#10
IA__g_assert_warning

    
                at gmessages.c
                  line
                  552

    

    • 

  • 
#10
IA__g_assert_warning

    • 








So I'm reopening this one; we should forward the bug to the dbus-glib bugzilla (fdo).






Comment 3


Reinout van Schouwen





          2006-09-25 21:38:31 UTC
        



Diego, can you tell us what dbus/dbus-glib versions you have so that an fd.o bug can be filed?






Comment 4


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-09-26 22:16:36 UTC
        



*** Bug 351151 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 5


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-09-26 22:17:25 UTC
        



(In reply to comment #2)
> Actually while the trace is very similar, the assertion that's failing is a
> different one: 

Eek!  Christian, you're right.

Sorry for the confusion. Bug has been marked as duplicate wrongly. I trusted that one... However, the stacktrace clearly shows bug 351151 is not the same issue as bug 34842. Correcting, so other duplicates won't be closed wrong.







Comment 6


Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail)





          2006-09-27 00:06:34 UTC
        



ii  dbus                                  0.93-0ubuntu1                        simple interprocess messaging system
ii  dbus-1-utils                          0.93-0ubuntu1                        simple interprocess messaging system (utilit
ii  libdbus-1-2                           0.62-4ubuntu4                        simple interprocess messaging system
ii  libdbus-1-3                           0.93-0ubuntu1                        simple interprocess messaging system
ii  libdbus-1-dev                         0.93-0ubuntu1                        simple interprocess messaging system (develo
ii  libdbus-glib-1-2                      0.71-1ubuntu1                        simple interprocess messaging system (GLib-b
ii  libdbus-glib-1-dev                    0.71-1ubuntu1                        simple interprocess messaging system (GLib i
ii  libdbus-qt-1-1c2                      0.62.git.20060814-1                  simple interprocess messaging system (Qt-bas
ii  libnet-dbus-perl                      0.33.2-0ubuntu3                      Perl XS API to the dbus inter-application me
ii  python-dbus                           0.71-2ubuntu1                        simple interprocess messaging system (Python







Comment 7


Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail)





          2006-09-29 03:16:04 UTC
        



Remember to close this after the forward.






Comment 8


Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail)





          2006-10-07 21:04:22 UTC
        



I have reported this as https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8546 .
Marking as NOTGNOME.






Comment 9


André Klapper





          2006-10-14 01:07:19 UTC
        



*** Bug 362053 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 10


André Klapper





          2006-10-30 00:07:20 UTC
        



*** Bug 367171 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 11


Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail)





          2006-12-03 05:38:02 UTC
        



*** Bug 368722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 12


Reinout van Schouwen





          2007-02-27 16:35:04 UTC
        



*** Bug 412637 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 13


Reinout van Schouwen





          2007-03-27 07:16:50 UTC
        



*** Bug 423233 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 14


Reinout van Schouwen





          2007-04-02 10:02:57 UTC
        



*** Bug 425222 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 15


Reinout van Schouwen





          2007-09-28 11:27:32 UTC
        



*** Bug 481162 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***