Bug 357369 – crash in Evolution: I believe I was just swi...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 357369 - crash in Evolution: I believe I was just swi...


Summary:	crash in Evolution: I believe I was just swi...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 354824

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	general
Version:	2.8.x (obsolete)
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Harish Krishnaswamy
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-09-23 20:30 UTC by Michael R Head
Modified:	2006-09-23 22:04 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description Michael R Head 2006-09-23 20:30:26 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
I believe I was just switching windows using compiz, because I wasn't directly interacting with evo itself.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 290697216 vsize: 0 resident: 290697216 share: 0 rss: 121798656 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1159043162 rtime: 0 utime: 3255 stime: 0 cutime:3147 cstime: 0 timeout: 108 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1232779600 (LWP 5494)]
[New Thread -1378014304 (LWP 5892)]
[New Thread -1386407008 (LWP 5891)]
[New Thread -1369621600 (LWP 5878)]
[New Thread -1320649824 (LWP 5815)]
[New Thread -1312257120 (LWP 5805)]
[New Thread -1311597664 (LWP 5786)]
[New Thread -1294660704 (LWP 5781)]
[New Thread -1286268000 (LWP 5780)]
[New Thread -1277875296 (LWP 5779)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 73084

Thread 1 (Thread -1232779600 (LWP 5494))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2 libgnomeui_segv_handle
at gnome-ui-init.c line 874
#3 segv_redirect
at main.c line 426
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 e_table_state_load_from_node
at e-table-state.c line 166
#6 e_table_state_load_from_file
at e-table-state.c line 128
#7 gal_view_etable_load
at gal-view-etable.c line 96
#8 gal_view_load
at gal-view.c line 76
#9 gal_view_collection_real_load_view_from_file
at gal-view-collection.c line 346
#10 gal_view_instance_load
at gal-view-instance.c line 296
#11 emfv_setup_view_instance
at em-folder-view.c line 593
#12 emfv_set_folder
at em-folder-view.c line 674
#13 emfb_set_folder
at em-folder-browser.c line 1810
#14 emfv_got_folder
at em-folder-view.c line 689
#15 get_folder_got
at mail-ops.c line 1230
#16 mail_msgport_replied
at mail-mt.c line 461
#17 g_io_unix_dispatch
at giounix.c line 162
#18 IA__g_main_context_dispatch
at gmain.c line 2045
#19 g_main_context_iterate
at gmain.c line 2677
#20 IA__g_main_loop_run
at gmain.c line 2881
#21 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
#22 main
at main.c line 615
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-09-23 22:04:38 UTC

Michael, perfectly matching stacktrace of your own bug. However, this description most likely adds a new piece to the puzzle. Thanks.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 354824 ***