After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 354442 - crash just after in ldap_op_finish
crash just after in ldap_op_finish
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution-data-server
Classification: Platform
Component: Contacts
1.8.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-addressbook-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-09-05 14:38 UTC by Christian Kirbach
Modified: 2007-09-20 20:06 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Another backtrace (12.22 KB, text/plain)
2006-09-05 17:01 UTC, Ola Thoresen
  Details
Patch (17.34 KB, patch)
2006-09-29 13:34 UTC, Devashish Sharma
committed Details | Review

Description Christian Kirbach 2006-09-05 14:38:30 UTC
Comment #7 from Ola Thoresen (reporter, points: 3) 
2006-09-04 21:13 UTC [reply] 
And the bug buddy backtrace from the same crash as comment #6

Memory status: size: 55439360 vsize: 0 resident: 55439360 share: 0 rss: 7901184
rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1157403439 rtime: 0 utime: 11 stime: 0 cutime:6 cstime:
0 timeout: 5 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/libexec/evolution-data-server-1.8'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208166704 (LWP 3499)]
[New Thread -1210651760 (LWP 3529)]
[New Thread -1210381424 (LWP 3500)]
0xb7ff0402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 2 (Thread -1210651760 (LWP 3529))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __lll_mutex_lock_wait
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 _L_mutex_lock_85
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 pthread_mutex_lock
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 gnome_segv_handler
    at server.c line 97
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ldap_op_finished
    at e-book-backend-ldap.c line 1068
  • #8 e_book_backend_stop_book_view
    at e-book-backend.c line 324
  • #9 impl_GNOME_Evolution_Addressbook_BookView_stop
    at e-data-book-view.c line 494
  • #10 _ORBIT_skel_small_GNOME_Evolution_Addressbook_BookView_stop
    at Evolution-DataServer-Addressbook-common.c line 40
  • #11 IOP_start_profiles
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #12 ORBit_OAObject_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #13 ORBit_small_invoke_adaptor
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #14 ORBit_recv_buffer_return_sys_exception
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #15 ORBit_recv_buffer_return_sys_exception
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #16 giop_thread_queue_process
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #17 giop_init
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #18 g_thread_pool_thread_proxy
    at gthreadpool.c line 265
  • #19 g_thread_create_proxy
    at gthread.c line 553
  • #20 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #21 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6

Comment 1 Ola Thoresen 2006-09-05 17:01:16 UTC
Created attachment 72262 [details]
Another backtrace

Hope I have all the needed -debuginfo packages now.
Comment 2 Christian Kirbach 2006-09-05 20:58:31 UTC
attached trace is as fine as the posted one 

confirming report altough we have one frame missing
Comment 3 Devashish Sharma 2006-09-29 13:34:45 UTC
Created attachment 73635 [details] [review]
Patch

This patch fixes the issue and will be committed for 2.8.1
Comment 4 Devashish Sharma 2006-09-29 16:17:49 UTC
Patch committed.
Comment 5 Ola Thoresen 2006-11-03 14:10:39 UTC
Is this the same bug as #274240?

I just posted a backtrace there, as I still have issues when searching LDAP for addresses.
Comment 6 Christian Kirbach 2006-11-03 14:37:50 UTC
the backtrace is different, and the original one posted is from a much older Evolution version.

But if you followed precisely the steps described in the other report and could trigger the crash you should leave a comment there telling that.
Comment 7 Christian Kirbach 2006-11-03 14:39:28 UTC
Devashish can we close this one?
Comment 8 Tobias Mueller 2007-09-20 20:06:43 UTC
note, that bug 449609 and it's dups (and their dups) look related to that issue, although they are a year younger than this bug here.