After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 353840 - crash in Computer: just pressed "Print scre...
crash in Computer: just pressed "Print scre...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 353629
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-09-01 13:41 UTC by Frederic Crozat
Modified: 2006-09-01 14:40 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description Frederic Crozat 2006-09-01 13:41:05 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?
just pressed "Print screen" to get a screenshot, accept proposed filename by gnome-screenshot and got the crash (probably when nautilus tried to get info about the new file)


Distribution: Mandriva Linux release 2007.0 (Cooker) for i586
Gnome Release: 2.15.92 2006-08-22 (Mandriva)
BugBuddy Version: 2.15.92

Memory status: size: 60899328 vsize: 0 resident: 60899328 share: 0 rss: 20754432 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1157117798 rtime: 0 utime: 276 stime: 0 cutime:248 cstime: 0 timeout: 28 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 4

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/libthread_db.so.1".
`shared object read from target memory' has disappeared; keeping its symbols.
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1228506816 (LWP 16678)]
0xbfffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 71362

Thread 1 (Thread -1228506816 (LWP 16678))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 strlen
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #5 IA__g_strdup
    at gstrfuncs.c line 90 






Comment 1


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-09-01 14:40:48 UTC
        



Frederic, looks like a duplicate to me. :)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 353629 ***