After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 353528 - crash in Shared Folders: Clicked "Share folder" i...
crash in Shared Folders: Clicked "Share folder" i...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 351861
Product: gnome-system-tools
Classification: Deprecated
Component: shares-admin
2.15.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Carlos Garnacho
Carlos Garnacho
: 353722 353878 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-08-30 10:45 UTC by Bernard
Modified: 2006-09-08 15:25 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description Bernard 2006-08-30 10:45:40 UTC
Version: 2.15.2

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Clicked "Share folder" in Nautilus.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.15.92 2006-08-22 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.15.92

Memory status: size: 68116480 vsize: 0 resident: 68116480 share: 0 rss: 11911168 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1156934842 rtime: 0 utime: 39 stime: 0 cutime:37 cstime: 0 timeout: 2 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/shares-admin'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225066832 (LWP 6661)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1225066832 (LWP 6661))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 ??
  • #5 ??
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Christian Kirbach 2006-08-30 20:52:40 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. Unfortunately, that stack trace is not very useful in determining the cause of the crash. Can you get us one with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so.
Comment 2 Bernard 2006-08-31 00:47:21 UTC
With some -dbg packages installed, this is what I get out of bug-buddy...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.15.92 2006-08-22 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.15.92

Memory status: size: 68685824 vsize: 0 resident: 68685824 share: 0 rss: 12447744 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1156984965 rtime: 0 utime: 44 stime: 0 cutime:40 cstime: 0 timeout: 4 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/shares-admin'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1224739152 (LWP 10485)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1224739152 (LWP 10485))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    at gnome-ui-init.c line 871
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 ??
  • #5 ??
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 3 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-08-31 19:34:11 UTC
*** Bug 353722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Christian Kirbach 2006-08-31 20:12:42 UTC
Unfortunately, that stack trace is not any better since we are missing some frames. what is the console output during the crash? in order to find out, please run

# gnome-session-remove nautilus
# nautilus

in a terminal and cause the crash.
Comment 5 Bernard 2006-08-31 20:37:21 UTC
Nothing special:

---------------------------------------------------
bernard@bernard:~$ gnome-session-remove nautilus
Removing 'nautilus' from the session
bernard@bernard:~$ nautilus
seahorse nautilus module initialized
Initializing nautilus-open-terminal extension
** (bug-buddy:10833): WARNING **: Kon geen pictogram laden voor Map openen
glibtop: This machine has 1 CPUs, 1 are being monitored.
Comment 6 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-09-01 17:39:25 UTC
*** Bug 353878 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Sebastien Bacher 2006-09-08 15:25:11 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 351861 ***