After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 345912 - New tabs appear off screen
New tabs appear off screen
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 345406
Product: epiphany
Classification: Core
Component: Tabs
2.14.x
Other All
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: Epiphany Maintainers
Marco Pesenti Gritti
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-06-25 23:10 UTC by incuo
Modified: 2006-07-17 21:48 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.13/2.14


Description incuo 2006-06-25 23:10:43 UTC 
Since Epiphany version 2.14.2.1-0ubuntu1, from the Nth tab created on (where N depends on screen resolution), tabs appear off screen (to the right).  This worked fine previously.

Other information:
Comment 1 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-07-01 19:28:29 UTC 
Hi. Please don't mark bugs FIXED without any comment and without them actually being fixed.
Comment 2 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-07-01 19:30:06 UTC 
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 330676 ***
Comment 3 Stefan Stuhr 2006-07-02 00:17:54 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into
> our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you
> find.


This is not necessary a duplicate of bug #330676. I believe it may be a duplicate of Ubuntu Dapper bug https://launchpad.net/products/gtk/+bug/50104 (there's a screenshot attached to that Ubuntu bug); I experienced it as well, and it was fixed a few days ago in an update.
Comment 4 Bruce Cowan 2006-07-02 13:46:35 UTC 
I also found this bug, and I think it is a duplicate of bug #345406.
Comment 5 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-07-17 21:48:31 UTC 
You're probably correct.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 345406 ***