After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 344866 - UML Class 'Wrap comment after this length' field is not loaded
UML Class 'Wrap comment after this length' field is not loaded
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 341887
Product: dia
Classification: Other
Component: import
0.95.1
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Dia maintainers
Dia maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-06-14 12:46 UTC by William FINK
Modified: 2006-06-15 10:39 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Sample file (6.02 KB, application/xml)
2006-06-14 12:49 UTC, William FINK 		Details

Description William FINK 2006-06-14 12:46:58 UTC 
Please describe the problem:
The field 'Wrap comment after this length' of UML Class obbject is not loaded properly from saved file.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create an UML class object
2. Change the 'Wrap comment after this length' tag to 100 on the Properties->Class
3. Save the file
4. Close it
5. Re-open it


Actual results:
The change made are not loaded back.
It returns to the '40' default value

Expected results:
Load the right value

Does this happen every time?
Yes

Other information:
When checking the xml file we can found:
      <dia:attribute name="comment_line_length">
        <dia:int val="100"/>
      </dia:attribute>
So the change is saved, but not loaded.
Comment 1 William FINK 2006-06-14 12:49:58 UTC 
Created attachment 67337 [details]
Sample file

This file has a value of comment_line_length to '100', but use a value of '40' when opening with dia.
Comment 2 Hans Breuer 2006-06-15 10:39:34 UTC 
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 341887 ***