After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 344000 - getAccessibleAtPoint doesn't account for table headers
getAccessibleAtPoint doesn't account for table headers
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 325809
Product: atk
Classification: Platform
Component: gail
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: bill.haneman
bill.haneman
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-06-06 12:09 UTC by Peter Parente
Modified: 2006-06-06 17:24 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
pyLinAcc interface to at-spi (required for test case, don't unzip) (16.10 KB, application/zip)
2006-06-06 12:10 UTC, Peter Parente
Details
Test case (2.04 KB, text/x-python)
2006-06-06 12:13 UTC, Peter Parente
Details

Description Peter Parente 2006-06-06 12:09:08 UTC
Easiest to see using a table with headers in gtk-demo, but also fails for other tables with headers that are children of the table.

1) Download the attached zip file and Python script. (Don't unpack the zip.)
2) Run gtk-demo.
3) Run the Editable Cells demo under Tree View.
4) Run the attached Python script with the zip file in the same folder.
5) Move the mouse over the cells in the table. Notice the information by the Component interface on the table widget is off by one row.
6) Move the mouse over the headers. Notice the cells below the headers are reported, not the headers themselves (i.e. it's still off by one row).

Also, the behavior of getAccessibleAtPoint is inconsistent once the table has been scrolled and resized. Sometimes, the reported cell is incorrect in both row and column after the scroll.
Comment 1 Peter Parente 2006-06-06 12:10:37 UTC
Created attachment 66816 [details]
pyLinAcc interface to at-spi (required for test case, don't unzip)
Comment 2 Peter Parente 2006-06-06 12:13:31 UTC
Created attachment 66817 [details]
Test case
Comment 3 Elijah Newren 2006-06-06 17:24:16 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 325809 ***