After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 343418 - Annoying .#evolution folder in the side bar
Annoying .#evolution folder in the side bar
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 318803
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.4.x (obsolete)
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Harish Krishnaswamy
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-05-30 17:28 UTC by j-bugs
Modified: 2006-05-30 19:19 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.11/2.12


Description j-bugs 2006-05-30 17:28:28 UTC 
Distribution: Gentoo Base System version 1.6.14
Package: Evolution
Severity: Normal
Version: GNOME2.12.3 unspecified
Gnome-Distributor: Gentoo
Synopsis: Annoying .#evolution folder in the side bar
Bugzilla-Product: Evolution
Bugzilla-Component: Miscellaneous
Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
Description:
Description of Problem:
I use Evolution and the maildir format for storing my email.   Evolution
creates an annoying .#evolution folder in the directory on my disk and
within the Evolution application side bar.  Is there any way to get
Evolution to not display that folder in the side bar?  Thanks

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. It's just there, created by Evolution
2. 
3. 

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


How often does this happen?
Always, even if I delete the folder, Evolution creates a new one and
displays it in the side bar.

Additional Information:




------- Bug created by bug-buddy at 2006-05-30 17:28 -------
Comment 1 André Klapper 2006-05-30 19:19:33 UTC 
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

For future reference, please file mailer bugs under mailer and not miscellaneous.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 318803 ***