After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 337781 - Bad and unwanted "Artist" names clutter the "Artist" list.
Bad and unwanted "Artist" names clutter the "Artist" list.
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 154671
Product: rhythmbox
Classification: Other
Component: general
0.9.x
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: RhythmBox Maintainers
RhythmBox Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-04-09 09:20 UTC by Ivan Matveich
Modified: 2006-04-09 09:43 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Ivan Matveich 2006-04-09 09:20:20 UTC
Please describe the problem:
I've imported all my tracks and three-quarters of my "Artist" list consists of
bogus artist names. This makes the interface hard to use.

There are also many legitimate artist names that I nevertheless do not want to
appear in the main artist list (eg, some random one-off track by some random
person.)

I don't want to delete this stuff, I just want to banish it to a sort of "dog
house" away from the artist list proper. For instance, Alt-n might move the
selected artist entry to 'Miscellaneous'.

I'd be happy to write such a patch next week; please let me know what you think
about the idea in general.

Steps to reproduce:


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:
Comment 1 Christophe Fergeau 2006-04-09 09:40:51 UTC
This is really similar to bug #318579. If you hack on that, try to make something a bit more generic than what you need, ie instead of having a single "Misc" artist name where you put all the artists you want to hide, it would be nice to be able to group N entries under an arbitrary artist name, M other entries under another artist name and so on (this would make it easier to add compilation support at a later point).
However, I dunno if that's easy to do, and if such a patch would be welcome (though my feelings are that it's probably not trivial to do, and that such a patch would be accepted if done right)
Comment 2 James "Doc" Livingston 2006-04-09 09:43:12 UTC
As well as being similar to 318579, it's a duplicate of bug 154671.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 154671 ***