After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 334202 - DnD icons across dual-monitor boundary causes crash
DnD icons across dual-monitor boundary causes crash
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 320126
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.12.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-03-11 10:47 UTC by Yi Lang Mok
Modified: 2006-03-24 06:16 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.11/2.12



Description Yi Lang Mok 2006-03-11 10:47:03 UTC
Steps to reproduce:
1. Click and drag icon on desktop or icon in window across boundary between monitors
2. Nautilus quits


Stack trace:


Other information:
Using dual monitor setup, non TwinView/Xinerama.
Comment 1 Yi Lang Mok 2006-03-11 20:32:19 UTC
In fact, it happens to a lot of other programs too (e.g. dragging names around in Gaim). The error may not lie with Nautilus, but with the x-server.
Comment 2 Teppo Turtiainen 2006-03-18 09:34:13 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. Without a stack trace from the crash it's very hard to determine what caused it.
Can you provide us with one? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so.
Comment 3 Yi Lang Mok 2006-03-24 04:21:42 UTC
I doubt this backtrace is very helpful. Seems like it's crashing in the libraries themselves and not nautilus (which supports idea that it goes beyond nautilus).



Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
`system-supplied DSO at 0xffffe000' has disappeared; keeping its symbols.
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226905920 (LWP 2470)]
[New Thread -1237914704 (LWP 2472)]
[New Thread -1236886608 (LWP 2471)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Comment 4 Teppo Turtiainen 2006-03-24 06:16:00 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 320126 ***