After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 333575 - nautilus quits as soon as it starts
nautilus quits as soon as it starts
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 166672
Product: nautilus-python
Classification: Other
Component: general
unspecified
Other other
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Johan (not receiving bugmail) Dahlin
Johan (not receiving bugmail) Dahlin
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-03-06 07:50 UTC by rromsey
Modified: 2006-03-06 10:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.11/2.12



Description rromsey 2006-03-06 07:50:30 UTC
Distribution: Slackware Slackware 10.2.0
Package: nautilus
Severity: Normal
Version: GNOME2.12.1 2.12.1
Gnome-Distributor: FRG gsb.sourceforge.net build for slackware
Synopsis: nautilus quits as soon as it starts
Bugzilla-Product: nautilus
Bugzilla-Component: general
Bugzilla-Version: 2.12.1
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.12.0)
Description:
Description of the crash: I start gnome session or manually type
nautilus on the command line and it tells me that it crashed


Steps to reproduce the crash:
1. $ startx

or
1. $ nautilus

Expected Results:
a message pops up saying that nautilus has quit unexpectantly

How often does this happen?
Every time

Additional Information:
I have slackware 10.2, I upgraded the kernel to 2.6.14. running on a
toshiba laptop satalite p30 rv2 (3.06GHz, 512Mb ram)

I just downloaded freerock gnome (from
ftp://mirror.cs.utah.edu/pub/linuxpackages//FreeRock-Gnome/frg-2.12.1/
). I used the install script (frg_install.sh) selected full install,
selected the metacity 2.12.1 (patched)  the Totem with the xine backend
and went for the new UDEV (not the one with slackware) sylpheed 2.0.4
and I enabled the rc.d scripts.

I have rebooted since I installed gnome with the same results


Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1227761984 (LWP 6094)]
[New Thread -1239254096 (LWP 6099)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1227761984 (LWP 6094)]
[New Thread -1239254096 (LWP 6099)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1227761984 (LWP 6094)]
[New Thread -1239254096 (LWP 6099)]
0xb7025411 in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0

Thread 1 (Thread -1227761984 (LWP 6094))

  • #0 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 PyModule_GetDict
    from /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0/libnautilus-python.so
  • #4 nautilus_python_init_python
    from /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0/libnautilus-python.so
  • #5 nautilus_module_initialize
    from /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0/libnautilus-python.so
  • #6 nautilus_mime_has_any_applications_for_file
    from /usr/lib/libnautilus-private.so.2
  • #7 g_type_module_use
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #8 nautilus_mime_has_any_applications_for_file
    from /usr/lib/libnautilus-private.so.2
  • #9 nautilus_mime_has_any_applications_for_file
    from /usr/lib/libnautilus-private.so.2
  • #10 nautilus_module_init
    from /usr/lib/libnautilus-private.so.2
  • #11 nautilus_application_new
  • #12 nautilus_application_startup
  • #13 main
  • #0 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0




------- Bug created by bug-buddy at 2006-03-06 07:50 -------


Unknown version 2.12.1 in product nautilus.  Setting version to "2.12.x".

Comment 1 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-03-06 10:47:59 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


Same stacktrace as bug 166672 and its duplicates.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 166672 ***