After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 330555 - Camera: thumbnails for (some) old pictures displayed
Camera: thumbnails for (some) old pictures displayed
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 151080
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: Thumbnails
2.10.x
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-02-09 19:03 UTC by maly.velky
Modified: 2006-06-16 16:40 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10



Description maly.velky 2006-02-09 19:03:35 UTC
Please describe the problem:
When I connect my digital camera for the 2nd time (with new pictures in it)
and open the folder (/media/mycamera/...) in nautilus, it displays thumbnails of
the pictures but for some of them (about 10 first ones) it displays thumbnails
of the pictures that were on the camera previously.
It doesn't help to reload the view.

I'd expect it to display thumbnails of the currently present images.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Connect a camera with some pictures to the PC and browse it in nautilus.
Disconnect.
2. Delete the old pictures and make some new.
3. Connect again, browse the folder - you will see some of the old thumbnails
(but if you click on it twice a new window with the actual picture shows up).


Actual results:
you will see some of the old thumbnails (but if you click on it twice a new
window with the actual picture shows up).

Expected results:
I'd expect a thumbnail of a picture to correspond to the picture.

Does this happen every time?
yes but not for all pictures on the camera - only for some of the first ones (at
most up to 10)

Other information:
Comment 1 Elijah Newren 2006-06-10 21:01:55 UTC
Duplicate of bug 151080?
Comment 2 Christian Neumair 2006-06-16 16:40:43 UTC
Probably.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 151080 ***