After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 325624 - Disable Print / Send to menu items for blank page
Disable Print / Send to menu items for blank page
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: epiphany
Classification: Core
Component: Interface
1.9.x
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Epiphany Maintainers
Marco Pesenti Gritti
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-01-03 13:44 UTC by Reinout van Schouwen
Modified: 2007-07-25 10:57 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement


Description Reinout van Schouwen 2006-01-03 13:44:41 UTC 
For blank pages the Print and Send to menu items are useless. It would make sense to disable them.
Comment 1 spark 2006-01-11 14:51:33 UTC 
I'm not really sure it would be worth doing this. Besides, in other apps like a text editor stuff isn't disabled when the page is blank.
Comment 2 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-01-11 15:22:17 UTC 
Well, if you compare about:blank with gedit's (admittedly not very document-oriented) "no files open" mode, then you see that gedit does disable most of the items in the File menu.
Comment 3 spark 2006-01-11 15:53:43 UTC 
Sure but if you click new to create a blank document the menu items get enabled:) Like you say, in ephy, you can't have "no documents open".
Comment 4 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-01-29 00:22:19 UTC 
For all practical purposes, about:blank *is* "no document".
Comment 5 Christian Persch 2006-02-15 22:19:03 UTC 
Easy to do with tab->priv->is_blank, but not sure it's worth it.
Comment 6 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2006-09-11 09:46:47 UTC 
Maybe I want to print a blank page :P.
Comment 7 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2007-07-25 04:12:04 UTC 
Mmm, so shall we "fix" this?
Comment 8 Christian Persch 2007-07-25 10:57:04 UTC 
Not worth it, I think.