After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 324980 - network manager code in sleep methods should be removed
network manager code in sleep methods should be removed
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: gnome-power-manager
Classification: Deprecated
Component: gnome-power-manager
SVN TRUNK
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: GNOME Power Manager Maintainer(s)
GNOME Power Manager Maintainer(s)
Depends on: 324979 326644
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-12-25 16:25 UTC by Jaap A. Haitsma
Modified: 2020-11-06 20:14 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Jaap A. Haitsma 2005-12-25 16:25:17 UTC
network-manager should handle sleep methods by itself
Comment 1 Jaap A. Haitsma 2005-12-25 16:26:25 UTC
This bug depends on bug 324979 of n-m
Comment 2 Richard Hughes 2005-12-27 20:40:24 UTC
Are we going to emit a DBUS signal when we want to hibernate? What's the plan?
Comment 3 Jaap A. Haitsma 2005-12-30 13:38:25 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Are we going to emit a DBUS signal when we want to hibernate? What's the plan?
> 
My first idea is to not use a DBUS signal. In my opinion n-m should just work without having to have to receive a dbus signal. 
My reasoning is that hibernation will not always be done via gpm but maybe via a script or the gnome-logout dialog etc. Therefore apps IMHO should support hibernation out of the box.
Comment 4 Richard Hughes 2005-12-30 13:54:29 UTC
So perhaps the n-m code should be shifted directly into the HAL script file that gets called when any hibernation is required. This already happend for Fedora Core Rawhide, which stops and starts the NetworkManager stuff in the pm-tools package.
Comment 5 Jaap A. Haitsma 2005-12-30 14:01:47 UTC
That could be an option, but then again if I installed other apps they would need to modify the scripts.

Can't n-m just work without being informed of hibernation?

If not IMHO there should something in HAL where apps can subscribe to receive info about if the system is going to hibernate.

Comment 6 Richard Hughes 2006-01-18 10:17:23 UTC
Should this also depend on #326644?
Comment 7 Jaap A. Haitsma 2006-01-18 20:35:35 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> Should this also depend on #326644?
> 
Yes adding it as a dependency

If we implement bug 326644 we should open a bug on network manager again. So that the interface gets implemented
Comment 8 André Klapper 2020-11-06 20:14:25 UTC
bugzilla.gnome.org is being replaced by gitlab.gnome.org. We are closing all old bug reports in Bugzilla which have not seen updates for many years.

If you can still reproduce this issue in a currently supported version of GNOME (currently that would be 3.38), then please feel free to report it at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-power-manager/-/issues/

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry it could not be fixed.