After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 320797 - Regression: chip-away.scm looks more like a chainsaw than chips
Regression: chip-away.scm looks more like a chainsaw than chips
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 307213
Product: GIMP
Classification: Other
Component: Script-Fu
git master
Other All
: High normal
: 2.4
Assigned To: GIMP Bugs
GIMP Bugs
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-11-06 06:45 UTC by Carol
Modified: 2005-11-09 09:49 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
here is an example from gimp-2.3 (77.22 KB, application/x-xcf)
2005-11-06 06:47 UTC, Carol
Details
the same parameters run through gimp-2.2 (44.11 KB, application/x-xcf)
2005-11-06 06:48 UTC, Carol
Details

Description Carol 2005-11-06 06:45:16 UTC
Run the script with the defaults and then make the background not visible.

The script claims "Supposed to look vaguely like roughly carved wood. Chipped
away if you will." and in gimp-2.2 it did.

gimp-2.3 it looks vaguely like someone roughly used a chainsaw and not the nice
sculptures I have seen like this before.
Comment 1 Carol 2005-11-06 06:47:13 UTC
Created attachment 54381 [details]
here is an example from gimp-2.3
Comment 2 Carol 2005-11-06 06:48:05 UTC
Created attachment 54382 [details]
the same parameters run through gimp-2.2
Comment 3 Michael Natterer 2005-11-06 15:48:49 UTC
Well it looks just more ugly than before :) but I guess whether I like the
effect doesn't count that much here. It's definitely a regression.
Comment 4 Kevin Cozens 2005-11-06 20:25:23 UTC
It looks like the layer containing the text is not being trimmed properly (ie. a
layer mask is not being applied properly if at all). Also, the drop shadow for
the text is also wrong.
Comment 5 Kevin Cozens 2005-11-09 02:39:20 UTC
The steps of the script appeared to be working properly until it got to the
gimp-edit-bucket-fill in line 77. Mitch on #gimp realized the problem may be
related to bug 307213 and the use of gimp-layer-set-lock-alpha in the script.

The script appears to run properly after commenting out the ...set-lock-alpha
call in line 59. This script could be closed as a duplicate of bug 307213 or
marked as dependant on that bug.
Comment 6 Michael Natterer 2005-11-09 09:49:33 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 307213 ***