After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 319866 - Update the screenshot dialog to look like the current GNOME one
Update the screenshot dialog to look like the current GNOME one
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: totem
Classification: Core
Component: Movie player
1.1.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: General Totem maintainer(s)
General Totem maintainer(s)
Depends on: 325708
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-10-26 15:36 UTC by Bastien Nocera
Modified: 2012-04-23 16:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
patch to match the GNOME 2.16 screenshot dialog. (24.68 KB, patch)
2006-09-20 00:18 UTC, Jan Arne Petersen 		rejected Details | Review

Description Bastien Nocera 2005-10-26 15:36:17 UTC 
SSIA
Comment 1 Jan Arne Petersen 2006-09-20 00:18:04 UTC 
Created attachment 73066 [details] [review]
patch to match the GNOME 2.16 screenshot dialog.

TODO: store the last selected folder to GConf.
Comment 2 Bastien Nocera 2006-09-20 10:56:19 UTC 
I would actually rather we waited for bug 325708 to be solved, and the widget to be made available outside gnome-utils.
Comment 3 Philip Withnall 2007-04-14 09:56:16 UTC 
Is this fixed with RH #232788 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232788), or are you planning to change to the proper screenshot dialog when bug #325708's fixed?
Comment 4 Bastien Nocera 2007-04-14 10:13:33 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> Is this fixed with RH #232788
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232788), or are you
> planning to change to the proper screenshot dialog when bug #325708's fixed?

It's kind of fixed, but it doesn't look too good... So I'd still like to use the same code as the gnome-utils one.
Comment 5 Bastien Nocera 2012-04-23 16:47:54 UTC 
We'll be going a slightly different way in the future, see bug 674640