After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 318916 - Printing multiple copies doesn't work
Printing multiple copies doesn't work
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evince
Classification: Core
Component: general
0.4.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Evince Maintainers
Evince Maintainers
: 330495 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-10-15 05:08 UTC by Arun Raghavan
Modified: 2007-01-18 22:06 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.11/2.12

Attachments
proposed patch (554 bytes, patch)
2005-10-26 00:56 UTC, Hubert Figuiere (:hub) 		none Details | Review
newer patch to fix the problem (1.32 KB, patch)
2005-10-26 05:51 UTC, Hubert Figuiere (:hub) 		none Details | Review

Description Arun Raghavan 2005-10-15 05:08:58 UTC 
Distribution/Version: Gentoo

What to do:
1. Open a PDF
2. Select File->Pring
3. Select the Job Tab
4. Set the number of copies to >1 (I tried 3, 4)
5. Hit OK

What happens:
1 copy of the file gets printed

What should happen
As many copies as specified should get printed
Comment 1 Hubert Figuiere (:hub) 2005-10-26 00:14:22 UTC 
I was about to find the same bug. Confirming.

On Ubuntu breezy:

ii  evince                      0.4.0-0ubuntu4              Document
(postscript, pdf) viewer
Comment 2 Hubert Figuiere (:hub) 2005-10-26 00:56:49 UTC 
Created attachment 53893 [details] [review]
proposed patch

Here is the patch to fix the problem. I'm not really sur if this is the right
way to do it, but it works.

Please review.
Comment 3 Hubert Figuiere (:hub) 2005-10-26 05:25:28 UTC 
actually that patch is not correct as it just generate several print jobs. it
shouldn't

I'm working on one that does also handle collate.
Comment 4 Hubert Figuiere (:hub) 2005-10-26 05:51:03 UTC 
Created attachment 53899 [details] [review]
newer patch to fix the problem

this patch is better

against 0.4.0

please review.
Comment 5 Nickolay V. Shmyrev 2005-10-26 19:34:35 UTC 
Committed, thanks.
Comment 6 Hubert Figuiere (:hub) 2005-10-27 00:24:28 UTC 
which version will it be in?
Comment 7 Nickolay V. Shmyrev 2005-10-27 09:58:41 UTC 
Next development release I think.
Comment 8 Nickolay V. Shmyrev 2006-02-10 04:44:03 UTC 
*** Bug 330495 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Nickolay V. Shmyrev 2007-01-18 22:06:52 UTC 
*** Bug 395573 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***