After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 318179 - GnuPG encryption problem
GnuPG encryption problem
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 266147
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.4.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-10-07 09:55 UTC by Ralf Weyer
Modified: 2006-07-03 13:14 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.11/2.12



Description Ralf Weyer 2005-10-07 09:55:23 UTC
Please describe the problem:
I've installed the preview-version of Ubuntu 5.10 and updated to the
latest today. Included in Ubuntu is the version 2.4.1 of Evolution. I
installed GnuPG (also the latest version included in Ubuntu), and
imported my safed public and private gpg-keys. Then I started Evolution
and wanted to read a mail that was encrypted and send be a friend using
Thunderbird/GnuPG/Enigmail. After the request and input of my passphrase I only
get the error messages shown in results.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Install GnuPG and Evolution
2. Let someone send you a mail crypted with GnuPG, for example with
Thunderbird/Enigmail
3. Try to encrypt and read the message


Actual results:
The following error messages appear:

Could not parse S/MIME message
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
gpg: armor header: Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
gpg: public key is F4646070
gpg: using subkey F4646070 instead of primary key 264C2A30
gpg: using subkey F4646070 instead of primary key 264C2A30
gpg: public key is 4429D2C8
gpg: encrypted with ELG-E key, ID 4429D2C8
gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit ELG-E key, ID F4646070, created 2005-02-21
"Ralf Weyer (Schl\xfc\x73sel von Ralf Weyer) <ralf.weyer@gmx.de>"
gpg: AES256 encrypted data
gpg: original file name=''
gpg: Signature made Do 06 Okt 2005 13:07:35 CEST using DSA key ID
AEB464DE
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found

Expected results:
Getting an encrypted and readable mail.

Does this happen every time?
I've tried it the last few days, I think about 20 times. Even a reinstallation
of GnuPG and Evolution did not help.

Other information:
In an Ubuntu-forum I've seen some threads from other users that experienced the
same problem, so it really seems to be an error.
Comment 1 André Klapper 2005-10-07 12:24:55 UTC
it seems that the message is both signed and encrypted, and you are missing the
 public key of the signature (DSA key ID AEB464DE). do you have that public key
installed and also set the trust correctly?

does this work outside of evolution on the shell?

can you post the link to the ubuntu-forum you're talking about?

reinstalling does not work, this is not windows. ;-) the application data will
not be removed by uninstalling an application under linux.

setting to NEEDINFO, please REOPEN when you add further information.

thanks in advance.
Comment 2 Ralf Weyer 2005-10-07 19:08:32 UTC
Hello,

thank's for the quick replay.

First here is one link to the ubuntuforum, sorry but it's in german. If you need
translation, just let me know. There was some other thread regarding to
problems, but at the moment I can only find this one (I'm getting old...)

http://www.ubuntuusers.de/viewtopic.php?t=9732&highlight=evolution+gpg

When I try to decrypt the saved mail gpg --decrypt encrypted.asc I can read the
mail, so gpg seems to work. And as I mentioned before it also works with
Thunderbird 1.0.6-0 and Sylpheed 2.1.1-1

And yepp, glad this isn't windows ;-)
Comment 3 André Klapper 2005-10-07 21:00:15 UTC
i don't care, i'm german, but all the novell guys around here won't
understand... ;-)

hmm... i guess this is a duplicate of bug 266147?
Comment 4 parthasarathi susarla 2005-10-08 05:48:41 UTC
Ok. confirming this. 
Comment 5 André Klapper 2006-03-11 12:13:32 UTC
ralf, do you think this is a duplicate of bug 266147?
Comment 6 André Klapper 2006-07-03 13:14:13 UTC
no feedback; marking as duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 266147 ***