After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 314483 - IOChannel creation fails in Python 2.4 on win32
IOChannel creation fails in Python 2.4 on win32
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Product: pygobject
Classification: Bindings
Component: gobject
2.9.0
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this now (help wanted and appreciated)
Python bindings maintainers
Depends on: 314482
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-08-25 18:53 UTC by John Ehresman
Modified: 2006-07-07 03:04 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description John Ehresman 2005-08-25 18:53:41 UTC 
Creating an IOChannel under Python 2.4 on win32 doesn't work because pygtk uses
a different C runtime dll than glib uses.  It also fails in the debug build
under Python 2.3 because the debug runtime is different than the release
runtime.  This is probably something that needs to be fixed in glib; see bug 314482
Comment 1 John Ehresman 2005-08-25 18:57:16 UTC 
Simple test to reproduce:

import sys
f = open(sys.argv[0], 'r')
import gobject
io = gobject.IOChannel(f.fileno())
Comment 2 Gustavo Carneiro 2005-10-29 13:27:05 UTC 
Maybe this is merely a build problem, not a source problem?  IMHO, bugzilla
should not be used for binary distribution problems, because none of the pygtk
developers actually do binary distributions, so who would fix these problems?
Comment 3 Johan (not receiving bugmail) Dahlin 2006-01-09 14:29:24 UTC 
This is either a glib bug or a build problem, is it okay to close this one John?
Comment 4 Johan (not receiving bugmail) Dahlin 2006-01-09 14:29:30 UTC 
This is either a glib bug or a build problem, is it okay to close this one John?
Comment 5 André Klapper 2006-07-07 03:04:38 UTC 
Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information Johan asked for.
Thanks!