After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 314463 - jpeg.exe plugins crashed
jpeg.exe plugins crashed
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 314018
Product: GIMP
Classification: Other
Component: Plugins
2.2.x
Other Windows
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: GIMP Bugs
GIMP Bugs
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-08-25 16:19 UTC by Lawrence
Modified: 2008-01-15 12:59 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Lawrence 2005-08-25 16:19:06 UTC
Please describe the problem:
When ever I am trying to open a jpg file the jpeg.exe plugin crashes.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Click on File --> Open
2. Go to a jpg folder and click on a file.
3. Click on Open


Actual results:
The program will say that the plug-in crashed

Expected results:
Open the file

Does this happen every time?
No

Other information:
Comment 1 Sven Neumann 2005-08-25 16:46:33 UTC
You aren't running the latest GTK+ release, are you?

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 300186 ***
Comment 2 Lawrence 2005-08-25 16:55:41 UTC
GTK + version 2.6.8. This was according to where I downloaded it. How can I
actually know for sure what version I am using?
Comment 3 Lawrence 2005-08-25 18:05:03 UTC
I have just updated to GTK 2.8.0 and it is still happening
Comment 4 Lawrence 2005-08-25 18:47:34 UTC
Is there a new version of jpeg.exe and where can I get it?
Comment 5 Lawrence 2005-08-25 18:48:54 UTC
re-opening. Asking for new version of jpeg.exe
Comment 6 weskaggs 2005-08-25 18:52:58 UTC
It probably isn't a function of which version of Gtk+ you are running, but
rather a function of which version of libexif.  Please try the suggestion in
comment #40 of bug #300186.
Comment 7 weskaggs 2005-08-25 18:56:05 UTC
Re comments #4 and #5, a new version of jpeg.exe is not going to help you if the
problem is in a dll, which it almost certainly is.  (The libexif dll, that is.)
Comment 8 Sven Neumann 2005-08-25 19:32:14 UTC
The gtk+ installer available from http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/stable.html
should have the right version of libexif. If there's still a problem with that
package, then this appears to be a new problem. You should then provide a JPEG
that triggers the bug.
Comment 9 Lawrence 2005-08-25 21:25:30 UTC
I have gotten the latest gtk. The stable version of gimp. libexif version from
commect #6 above. I will attach the jpg that triggers my problem. thanks
Comment 10 Lawrence 2005-08-25 21:26:57 UTC
can not attach my file. To big. can i send it directly to your email address?
Comment 11 Sven Neumann 2005-08-25 22:37:18 UTC
You could at least have waited but you send it nevertheless. The file opens just
fine here, so we have to assume that the error is not in the gimp plug-in but
either in libjpeg or libexif.

exifinfo shows one suspicious EXIF entry:

  User Comment        |Invalid size of entry (8, expected 0 x 1).

So it appears that the embedded EXIF info is not quite correct but of course
libexif should handle this gracefully. And apparently it does so with the
version I am using (libexif 0.6.12-2 from with debian sid).
Comment 12 Lawrence 2005-08-25 23:17:07 UTC
I am sorry for not waiting for your reply. I am just so excited with using gimp
and i can't use it until I fix the problem I am having. I am using windows and i
can not find a windows version of the library. Do you have one and can you
attach it? 

Thank you very much.

Lawrence
Comment 13 Sven Neumann 2005-08-25 23:28:29 UTC
I wouldn't touch Windows with a ten-feet pole.
Comment 14 weskaggs 2005-08-26 15:44:46 UTC
Do you have problems with all jpeg files, or just files from one specific source
(such as a specific digital camera)?  If so, could you tell us what the source is?
Comment 15 Lawrence 2005-08-26 20:52:22 UTC
Not happening to all jpeg files. Just with certail files. 
Comment 16 weskaggs 2005-08-28 15:50:03 UTC
And would you happen to have any insight as to what sort of files those might be?
Comment 17 Lawrence 2005-09-06 20:18:19 UTC
According to comment 11 those that have bad exif. I have version 11 of libexif i
can't seem to find a windows version of version 12. Do you have version 12 of
the said library?

Thank,
Law
Comment 18 weskaggs 2005-09-07 15:54:41 UTC
Ahem.  Libexif is a rather flaky library, and there has been more than one
problem identified with it.  Not all of the problems are fixed in version 12. 
There is, for example, a problem that only affects images from Canon digital
cameras or scanners, which is apparently not fixed in any version.  So if the
only files you have trouble with are images from your digital camera, it would
be nice to know that, and to know the make and model of the camera.  If you have
trouble with files from multiple sources, it would be nice to know that as well.
Comment 19 Lawrence 2005-09-07 18:29:55 UTC
I have a Canon Digital Rebel camera. I am not having problems with all my
images. only some of them. I can not figure out what the commonality are. So
only some from my camera. 
Comment 20 weskaggs 2005-09-07 22:11:51 UTC
In that case, this is probably a duplicate of bug #314018.  Thanks for the
information.  Unfortunately, we may not be able to fix the problem until the
libexif maintainers do something about it.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 314018 ***