After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 314027 - Proposal to add a simplified UI layout: single window + tabs
Proposal to add a simplified UI layout: single window + tabs
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 121087
Product: GIMP
Classification: Other
Component: User Interface
2.2.x
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: GIMP Bugs
GIMP Bugs
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-08-20 12:14 UTC by Maurizio Colucci
Modified: 2008-01-15 12:58 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Maurizio Colucci 2005-08-20 12:14:50 UTC
Distribution/Version: Suse 9.3

Hello,

I propose to provide an additional, simplified user interface layout, where GIMP: 

1. uses only one window;

2. uses tabs to switch among open files. (see red rectangle in screenshot)

3. uses tabs to switch among tools (e.g. channels, paths, tool options, etc).
(See green rectangle in screenshot).

Screenshots:

http://tinyurl.com/8ogxq

http://tinyurl.com/agrps

Some of the advantages this would bring:

* you would no more be required to click twice in the taskbar to edit a
picture---once to activate the picture and once to activate the tool window. 
(Note: I know the options "hints for the toolbox" but it is ignored by most
window managers, most notably kwin);

* you would no more be required to move and resize each new window by hand. Each
time I open a new file, I have to drag the window top-left and then enlarge it.
(Maximizing does not work because the toolbox window would be covered as well.)
This tends to be frustrating, without providing any advantage for non-power
users, who only need to see one picture at a time.

Comments would be appreciated. Cheers!
Comment 1 tobias 2005-08-20 20:01:00 UTC
This is a duplicate of bug #121087
Comment 2 Sven Neumann 2005-08-20 20:46:53 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 121087 ***
Comment 3 weskaggs 2005-08-22 15:18:06 UTC
As you can probably tell by looking at the referenced bug reports, if you are
proposing to yourself do the coding to add this extra interface, you would be
providing something that has long been wanted and would be highly valued, so by
all means go ahead and give it a try.