After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 313732 - gnome-terminal crashs
gnome-terminal crashs
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 161843
Product: gnome-terminal
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.10.x
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: GNOME Terminal Maintainers
GNOME Terminal Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-08-17 16:03 UTC by Thomas Steudten
Modified: 2005-08-18 13:29 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10



Description Thomas Steudten 2005-08-17 16:03:30 UTC
Distribution: Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz)
Package: gnome-terminal
Severity: normal
Version: GNOME2.10.0 2.10.0
Gnome-Distributor: Red Hat, Inc
Synopsis: gnome-terminal crashs
Bugzilla-Product: gnome-terminal
Bugzilla-Component: general
Bugzilla-Version: 2.10.0
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.10.0)
Description:
Description of the crash:
gnome-terminal crashs

Steps to reproduce the crash:
1. open one gnome-terminal
2. start "gnome-terminal -e top -t top &" and "gnome-terminal -e top -e
slabtop" &
3. Resize font of the two terminal with "ctrl-MINUS" 
4. in the 1. terminal enter: gnome-session-save -> crash.

Expected Results: No crash


How often does this happen? reproducible


Additional Information:



Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208224064 (LWP 22822)]
[New Thread -1218954320 (LWP 22827)]
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00466402 in ?? ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208224064 (LWP 22822))

  • #0 ??
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 vfprintf
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #5 vasprintf
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #6 g_vasprintf
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 g_strdup_vprintf
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_print
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 terminal_app_edit_encodings
  • #10 _gnome_marshal_BOOLEAN__INT_ENUM_BOOLEAN_ENUM_BOOLEAN
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #11 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_signal_stop_emission
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #13 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 gnome_client_get_config_prefix
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #16 _SmcProcessMessage
    from /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6
  • #17 IceProcessMessages
    from /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6
  • #18 gnome_href_set_label
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #19 g_vasprintf
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #21 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #22 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #23 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 main




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@gnome.bugs 2005-08-17 16:03 UTC -------


Unknown version 2.10.0 in product gnome-terminal.  Setting version to "2.10.x".
The original reporter of this bug does not have
   an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved
   it here, unknown@gnome.bugs.
   Previous reporter was thomas@steudten.com.

Comment 1 Guillaume Desmottes 2005-08-18 13:29:24 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into
our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the
bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report?

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 161843 ***