After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 311891 - Deletion Of One GW Recur Meeting Loses Bolding On Mini Calendar For A While
Deletion Of One GW Recur Meeting Loses Bolding On Mini Calendar For A While
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Calendar
2.4.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks: 317266
 
 
Reported: 2005-07-28 20:18 UTC by David Richards
Modified: 2013-09-13 00:49 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description David Richards 2005-07-28 20:18:26 UTC
Please describe the problem:
This bug is going to scare users into thinking they clicked on "Delete All
Occurences" instead of selecting "Delete This Occurence".

I sent to Mike an appointment that recurs 3 days in a row.  As Mike I accepted
them and the dates appear with bold numbers in the mini calendar on the left
correctly.  I then clicked the last date of the meeting and the event was
correctly in my daily calendar.  I then clicked focus into the meeting, right
mouse clicked and select "Delete this Occurrence". Dialog came up and asked if I
was sure I wanted to delete it and I answered yes.  All 3 bolded days in the
mini-calendar went away and from that calendar looked like all 3 of the meetings
had been deleted.  When I clicked into the other 2 days, they were still there,
just not bolded by calendar date.  After about 5 minutes, the calender flashed
again and the remaining 2 came back.


Steps to reproduce:
1. 
2. 
3. 


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:
Comment 1 Chenthill P 2005-07-29 04:55:09 UTC
You could press clear on search bar to get the dates bolded again(a workaround).
Will look into it, thanks.
Comment 2 David Richards 2006-06-28 17:42:12 UTC
This seems to not be happening now.