After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 308254 - Evince plug-in for Mozilla-based browsers
Evince plug-in for Mozilla-based browsers
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 168933
Product: evince
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Evince Maintainers
Evince Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-06-19 07:12 UTC by Chi Shang Cheng
Modified: 2006-03-27 19:46 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Chi Shang Cheng 2005-06-19 07:12:10 UTC
There should be more transparency between information we download from the
Internet. The user shouldn't care about what file-types and associated
applications he should use. When the users clicks on a hyperlink that links to a
pdf file, the user should not be confronted with the fact that is a pdf
document. Instead, it should 'just work' and just display it right in the
browser. Of course there should be an option to save these documents, but since
so many people have broadband internet connections, does a user still care
whether he or she bookmarks a html page or a pdf document? The user just want
the computer to remember a piece of information whether that is stored as html
or pdf.
Comment 1 Marco Pesenti Gritti 2005-06-19 11:18:44 UTC
Personally I hate pdf in browser. I think browser downloads/document opening
should be simplified, but I dont see reasons to display the document inside the
browser window.

Bryan, what do you think?
Comment 2 Chi Shang Cheng 2005-06-19 13:08:49 UTC
I think the main reason you think so is that Adobe Acrobot is simply too slow.
Evince doesn't have that problem.
Comment 3 Bryan W Clark 2005-06-20 04:33:52 UTC
While I agree with you in the spirit of what you're saying, in practice this
turns out to be a wild goose chase worthy of the Lilliputians.  Simply put,
trying to make PDFs look and behave just like web pages is like trying to drive
all of the roads in the world the same way.  Even though there are highways,
alleys, and roads of all sizes in between, you could try to ignore that and
drive at break neck speeds on all of them.  Or realize that some paths are built
for different purposes than others and it's often best and easiest to respect
that, than to idyllically ignore it. 

So the Evince team has chosen from the begining, for better or worse, to not be
a plugin to browsers and be our own thing.  And as always, marco is spot on that
the download/document opening needs some real design and simplification.
Comment 4 Christian Persch 2006-03-27 19:46:53 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 168933 ***