After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 307724 - Very very slow rendering of some PDF files
Very very slow rendering of some PDF files
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 170207
Product: evince
Classification: Core
Component: general
0.3.x
Other All
: High major
: ---
Assigned To: Evince Maintainers
Evince Maintainers
: 308144 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-06-15 05:38 UTC by Lionel Dricot
Modified: 2005-08-24 21:08 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10

Attachments
the pdf file (29.03 KB, application/pdf)
2005-06-15 05:40 UTC, Lionel Dricot 		Details

Description Lionel Dricot 2005-06-15 05:38:52 UTC 
Please describe the problem:
Sometimes, the rendering of a PDF can be very very slow (20-30 seconds),
consuming the whole CPU

Steps to reproduce:
1. Open the PDF attached in the first comment
2. Wait....
3. Open it with xpdf : it's so fast !!!


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?
yes

Other information:
using Evince 0.3.1 on Ubuntu Hoary (package from Sarge)
Comment 1 Lionel Dricot 2005-06-15 05:40:10 UTC 
Created attachment 47787 [details]
the pdf file

here's one example of very slow PDF. (it's only 3 pages and there's no problem
with it in xpdf)
Comment 2 Vincent Noel 2005-06-15 15:07:23 UTC 
Yep, confirmed. Rendering is extremely slow for some reason.
This might be a poppler bug...
Comment 3 Michaël Arnauts 2005-06-18 14:23:13 UTC 
*** Bug 308144 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Marco Pesenti Gritti 2005-07-11 11:23:11 UTC 
Hi, this looks like a bug with the PDF backend.  Could you please follow these
instructions to help get this 
 bug fixed.  Thank You. http://live.gnome.org/Evince/PopplerBugs#poppler
Comment 5 Marco Pesenti Gritti 2005-07-26 12:55:44 UTC 
This may be similar/dup of bug 170207
Comment 6 Luis Villa 2005-08-24 21:08:05 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 170207 ***