After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 306880 - Evolution still checks for spam when disabled on account
Evolution still checks for spam when disabled on account
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 264455
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.2.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-06-08 13:05 UTC by Peter Robinson
Modified: 2005-06-21 12:37 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10



Description Peter Robinson 2005-06-08 13:05:38 UTC
Please describe the problem:
When disabling the option to check for spam with the account settings evolution
continues to do so with the consequence that it occasionally crashes or locks
up. Further investigation finds that if the 'Preferences/Mail
Preferences/Junk/Check incoming mail for junk' is enabled it will continue to
check mail for junk even if the option to check for Junk is unchecked in the
local account settings.

This is using the exchange connector.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create and account
2. Disable junk checking on the account
3. Check mail watching processes for a spamc process


Actual results:


Expected results:
If an account explicitly disables spam checking the global shouldn't override
the specific account options.

Does this happen every time?
Yes

Other information:
Evolution 2.2.2 with evolution-connector 2.2.2 running on Fedora Core 4 rawhide
Comment 1 André Klapper 2005-06-08 14:54:32 UTC
adding UI keyword, since there are *two* (pretty confusing) options in the UI.
Comment 2 André Klapper 2005-06-08 15:03:41 UTC
peter: do you think this is a duplicate of bug 264455?
Comment 3 Peter Robinson 2005-06-08 16:12:15 UTC
andre: Yes looks pretty similar. I couldn't find this when I searched for it
this morning but it's probably because its under v 1.5 and not 2.2.x as I may
have searched. Can it be updated so its possibly included in the bug day coming up?
Comment 4 Nagappan Alagappan 2005-06-21 12:37:17 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 264455 ***