After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 305883 - Process listing doesn't fit in default window size
Process listing doesn't fit in default window size
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: system-monitor
Classification: Core
Component: general
git master
Other Linux
: Normal trivial
: ---
Assigned To: System-monitor maintainers
System-monitor maintainers
Depends on: 341241
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-05-30 01:14 UTC by Martin Ejdestig
Modified: 2011-11-18 23:35 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Shot of proposed columns (it doesn't quite fit) (45.13 KB, image/png)
2005-06-13 14:20 UTC, Martin Ejdestig
  Details
Proposed patch (2.13 KB, patch)
2011-11-17 05:54 UTC, Robert Roth
none Details | Review

Description Martin Ejdestig 2005-05-30 01:14:34 UTC
The default settings for the process listing are unlikely to make it fit in the
view without scrollbars of a window with the default size.

How about:
1) Changing the default Process Fields to be displayed to Process Name, Memory,
% CPU and ID.
2) Disabling process dependencies by default.
Comment 1 Benoît Dejean 2005-05-30 08:38:25 UTC
i'm currenlty thinking about removing the expander.

1) Name, Resident Memory, VM, %CPU, ID, User and time ?
2) done.
Comment 2 Martin Ejdestig 2005-05-31 18:19:22 UTC
1) How on earth do you make all that information fit in a window with a width of
440 pixels?
Comment 3 Benoît Dejean 2005-05-31 18:46:02 UTC
What do Window$, O$ X and KDE display in their system monitor by default ? I
have to check (i bet KDE default view displays everything ;).
Comment 4 Martin Ejdestig 2005-06-12 04:09:28 UTC
Comprehensive list of system monitors at:
http://www.aresluna.org/guidebook/components/system/managers/tasks

View at the left of the screenshot shows different states (the process list
isn't always the first).

Misses KDE though and I haven't had it installed since I went Ubuntu. But the
answer is most likely everything and the kitchen sink ;).
Comment 5 Benoît Dejean 2005-06-12 07:54:06 UTC
Name, PID, User, CPU%, Memory% ?
Name, PID, User, CPU%, MemRES ?
Comment 6 Benoît Dejean 2005-06-12 09:16:05 UTC
do you think a Memory% would be useful ?
Comment 7 Martin Ejdestig 2005-06-13 14:00:13 UTC
If any memory usage should be shown by default I think it should be the amount
of physical memory used (or the one closest to it).
Comment 8 Martin Ejdestig 2005-06-13 14:11:28 UTC
Memory%? Ah, you mean we should add another column that is the precent of memory
used. It might be useful. Though one interesting point to note is that Mac OS
switched from displaying percent to MB in Panther.

Another point to note is that Name, PID, User, CPU%, <something more> probably
won't fit. ;)

Perhaps the default width should be increased to make place for the columns you
suggested...
Comment 9 Martin Ejdestig 2005-06-13 14:20:41 UTC
Created attachment 47713 [details]
Shot of proposed columns (it doesn't quite fit)
Comment 10 Benoît Dejean 2005-06-13 15:21:02 UTC
better switch to Resident Memory
Comment 11 Benoît Dejean 2006-06-21 21:12:42 UTC
Once we have one true meaningful memory stat, it will be easy to fix.
Comment 12 Robert Roth 2011-11-17 05:54:46 UTC
Created attachment 201572 [details] [review]
Proposed patch

Only show the Name, PID, User, CPU% and Memory columns, to better fit in the default window size, and to hide columns not used by the average user (Status, Nice).
Comment 13 Chris Kühl 2011-11-18 23:35:13 UTC
Thanks. I've applied this although it seems a little sparse to tell you the truth. Maybe nice should be added back. I'll see how the feedback is after the release on monday.