After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 302358 - Vino Setup Dialog Crash on Disable "Allow others to view Desktop"
Vino Setup Dialog Crash on Disable "Allow others to view Desktop"
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 166873
Product: vino
Classification: Applications
Component: Preferences Dialog
2.10.x
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Vino Maintainer(s)
Vino Maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-04-28 23:29 UTC by alexander.baldeck
Modified: 2005-04-29 05:07 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10



Description alexander.baldeck 2005-04-28 23:29:01 UTC
Distribution: Unknown
Package: vino
Severity: normal
Version: GNOME2.10.1 2.10.x
Gnome-Distributor: Archlinux
Synopsis: Vino Setup Dialog Crash on Disable "Allow others to view Desktop"
Bugzilla-Product: vino
Bugzilla-Component: Preferences Dialog
Bugzilla-Version: 2.10.x
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.10.0)
Description:
Description of the crash:
the setup dialog always crashes when "Allow others to view Desktop"
(first option from the top) is being disabled / unchecked.

Steps to reproduce the crash:
1. open dialog, activate option 1 and 2 (from the top), set a password
2. close the dialog and open it again right afterwards
3. then disable / uncheck described option

Expected Results:
crash

How often does this happen?
always

Additional Information:



Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/opt/gnome/bin/vino-preferences'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1224205600 (LWP 5765)]
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in ?? ()
  • #0 ??
  • #1 ??
  • #2 ??
  • #3 ??
  • #4 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
  • #5 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #6 <signal handler called>
  • #7 get_gc
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #8 gdk_pango_renderer_draw_glyphs
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #9 pango_renderer_draw_glyphs
    from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
  • #10 pango_renderer_draw_layout_line
    from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
  • #11 pango_renderer_draw_layout
    from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
  • #12 gdk_draw_layout_with_colors
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 gdk_draw_layout
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 gtk_default_draw_layout
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 gtk_paint_layout
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 gtk_label_expose
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 vino_url_get_type
  • #18 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_type_class_meta_marshal
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 signal_emit_unlocked_R
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 ??
  • #23 ??
  • #24 ??
  • #25 ??
  • #26 ??
  • #27 ??
  • #28 __JCR_LIST__
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #29 ??
  • #30 ??
  • #31 ??
  • #32 ??
  • #33 ??
  • #34 ??
  • #35 ??
  • #36 ??
  • #37 ??
  • #38 ??
  • #39 ??
  • #40 ??
  • #41 ??
  • #42 ??
  • #43 ??
  • #44 class_closures_cmp
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2005-04-28 23:29 -------


Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other".
Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "vino".
   Setting to default milestone for this product, '---'
The original reporter of this bug does not have
   an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved
   it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
   Previous reporter was alexander.baldeck@unrast.de.
Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED".
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 Elijah Newren 2005-04-29 05:07:03 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into
our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 166873 ***