After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 301684 - Menu background color: highlighted white instead of non-highlighted grey
Menu background color: highlighted white instead of non-highlighted grey
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 137778
Product: yelp
Classification: Applications
Component: General
2.6.x
Other other
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: Shaun McCance
Yelp maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-04-23 10:22 UTC by Malte
Modified: 2005-05-12 13:06 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.7/2.8



Description Malte 2005-04-23 10:22:10 UTC
Distribution: Debian 3.1 (testing/sarge)
Package: Yelp
Severity: minor
Version: GNOME2.8.1 2.6.x
Gnome-Distributor: Debian
Synopsis: Menu background color: highlighted white instead of non-highlighted grey
Bugzilla-Product: Yelp
Bugzilla-Component: general
Bugzilla-Version: 2.6.x
Description:
Description of Problem:

Yelp's menu items background color is wrong for me. All items are shown
to me with a white background, which is the color my theme specifies for
highlighted items.

This problem does not occur with every theme. Using the Crux theme,
e.g., it looks the right way. Using the default Gnome theme, it does
not. Using the Gorilla theme, it is wrong, but in another way: now the
menus theirselves are right, but the background color of the menu bar
and the toolbar is white.

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Choose the default Gnome theme, the Simple theme or the Gorilla
theme.
2. Observe the colors of yelp's menus.




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2005-04-23 06:22 -------


Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other".
Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "Yelp".
   Setting to default milestone for this product, '---'
Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED".
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 Malte 2005-04-23 10:30:20 UTC
I posted this bug using bug-buddy. In a mail I received I was told there are
problems which may be caused by the use of an old version of bug-buddy. (I'm
using 2.8.0.)

Shall I rereport this bug without bug-buddy?

What does "qa" mean?
Comment 2 Olav Vitters 2005-04-23 16:55:37 UTC
Malte: The script that changes a bug-buddy bug into an actual bugreport is very
stupid. When a mailclient like Evolution is used to report a bug, the script
can't always understand it.
It does forward the bugreports somewhere else for analysis. In this case I
mailed again for you. The script expects Synopsis: to be on one line, but
Evolution wrapped it. When I mailed it again I kept that on one line, so
eventually it worked.
QA contact is ideally someone doing testing, etc.. the message is not important.
Comment 3 Don Scorgie 2005-05-12 13:06:54 UTC
Hi,

Thanks for taking the time to report this.  This is a duplicate of bug #137778
and is fixed in Yelp 2.9 / 2.10.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 137778 ***