GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 301599
Subject line crashing evolution mail editor
Last modified: 2013-09-10 14:03:39 UTC
Steps to reproduce: 1. Create a new mail, fill any recipient 2. Fill following subject: "X ě" (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER X, SPACE, LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH CARON) 3. Send it -> Crash Stack trace: Backtrace was generated from '/opt/gnome/bin/evolution-2.2' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/tls/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) 0x00002aaaaf905eca in waitpid () from /lib64/tls/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 58559
Other information: Bug can be repeated in SuSE Linux 9.3 (AMD64) and Debian Sid (i386)
The backtrace is pretty incomplete and without good symbol information. Could you run it in gdb and do a 'bt full' or something like that?
eolution --disable-crash-dialog does not work, attaching cut'n'paste from bug-buddy after installation of debuginfo. Bug should be simply repeatable by entering three characters upper mentioned characters into subject line. Backtrace was generated from '/opt/gnome/bin/evolution' Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/tls/libthread_db.so.1". 0x00002aaaaf905eca in waitpid () from /lib64/tls/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 58692
Crashes here on FC4test and a normal Pentium M laptop: Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1209092416 (LWP 3397)] [New Thread -1272124496 (LWP 5840)] [New Thread -1258689616 (LWP 5839)] [New Thread -1247310928 (LWP 3492)] [New Thread -1233200208 (LWP 3490)] [New Thread -1222706256 (LWP 3457)] [New Thread -1212216400 (LWP 3456)] 0x00bb1402 in ?? ()
+ Trace 58698
Thread 1 (Thread -1209092416 (LWP 3397))
This is already patched in CVS, did you file this downstream as well? Patch is in main bug (273945 - trace is different but it should be the same issue and the fix prevents the problem) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 273945 ***