After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 273851 - Sorting Threaded Message List Chronologically
Sorting Threaded Message List Chronologically
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 203206
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.2.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Triage Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-03-18 18:28 UTC by joachim
Modified: 2013-09-13 00:49 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement



Description joachim 2005-03-18 18:28:16 UTC
Distribution: Unknown
Package: Evolution
Priority: Wishlist
Version: GNOME2.10.0 2.1
Gnome-Distributor: FreeBSD GNOME Project
Synopsis: Sorting Threaded Message List Chronologically
Bugzilla-Product: Evolution
Bugzilla-Component: Mailer
Bugzilla-Version: 2.1
Description:
Description of Problem:

When showing a message list chronologically (Date in descending order,
newest on top) and selecting 'Threaded Message List' (Ctrl+T) in the
View Menu, the messages are grouped in threads as they should, but
sorted by the OLDEST message of the group.

This means that an old thread keeps dripping further and further down
the message list (and outside the visible area) even though there are
brand-new messages added to the thread. In mailboxes with unread
messages, you're very likely to be missing new messages or, best case,
you'll have to scroll to spot the new messages. In mailboxes with
thousands of mails (as in my case), this is a hassle.

Suggestion: Sort message groups by the NEWEST mail in the thread


Unknown reporter: joachim@bondo.net, changed to bugbuddy-import@ximian.com.
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 André Klapper 2005-03-31 18:36:38 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 203206 ***