After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 270580 - Problem in 'All Day Event' recurrence appointment
Problem in 'All Day Event' recurrence appointment
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 271679
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Calendar
2.0.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-12-15 15:58 UTC by Poornima
Modified: 2013-09-10 14:03 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Poornima 2004-12-15 15:58:34 UTC 
Please fill in this template when reporting a bug, unless you know what you
are doing.
Description of Problem:


Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Click on File ->New Meeting.
2. Type summary, let 'All Day event' be checked.
3. Set recurrence value for 10 days.
4. In list view u can see 10 appointmnets.
5. Select one and make 'Movable'.
6. I can see that only one which is 'M<ovable' appointment remains, rest
gets deleted

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


How often does this happen? 
Always

Additional Information:
Comment 1 Ramesh Babu 2004-12-16 06:18:50 UTC 
when i try no recurrence appointments are getting deleted.

attaching debug info

loading error file
/opt/gnome/share/evolution/2.0/errors/addressbook-errors.xml
loading error file
/opt/gnome/share/evolution/2.0/errors/calendar-errors.xml
loading error file
/opt/gnome/share/evolution/2.0/errors/e-system-errors.xml
loading error file /opt/gnome/share/evolution/2.0/errors/filter-errors.xml
loading error file /opt/gnome/share/evolution/2.0/errors/shell-errors.xml
loading error file /opt/gnome/share/evolution/2.0/errors/mail-errors.xml
calendar-gui-Message: e_day_view_on_unrecur_appointment(): Could not
update the object!
Comment 2 André Klapper 2005-03-01 02:19:39 UTC 
also see bug 271679
Comment 3 André Klapper 2005-05-09 21:46:57 UTC 
poornima: can you still reproduce this with the latest version?
rodrigo: could be a duplicate of solved bug 271679, please check...
Comment 4 André Klapper 2005-05-22 00:09:07 UTC 
...so assuming that this is a duplicate of bug 271679

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 271679 ***