Bug 265848 – Crash: Proceso (6100)

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 265848 - Crash: Proceso (6100)


Summary:	Crash: Proceso (6100)


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 242867

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	Mailer
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	Normal normal
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Evolution Triage Team
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2004-09-13 14:51 UTC by Rodrigo Flores
Modified:	2004-09-14 00:19 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	---

Description Rodrigo Flores 2004-09-13 14:51:54 UTC

Distribution: SuSE Linux 9.1 (i586)
Package: Evolution
Priority: Normal
Version: GNOME2.4.1 unspecified
Gnome-Distributor: GNOME.Org
Synopsis: Proceso (6100)
Bugzilla-Product: Evolution
Bugzilla-Component: Mailer
Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.4.0.1)
Description:
Description of the crash:
Al estar verificando mails.

Steps to reproduce the crash:
1. 
2. 
3. 

Expected Results:


How often does this happen?


Additional Information:



Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/opt/gnome/bin/evolution-1.4'

(no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using
libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1094660736 (LWP 6100)]
[New Thread 1119902640 (LWP 6131)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1094660736 (LWP 6100)]
[New Thread 1119902640 (LWP 6131)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1094660736 (LWP 6100)]
[New Thread 1119902640 (LWP 6131)]
[New Thread 1117801392 (LWP 6130)]
[New Thread 1115700144 (LWP 6129)]
[New Thread 1113598896 (LWP 6128)]
[New Thread 1111493552 (LWP 6107)]
[New Thread 1107663792 (LWP 6104)]
[New Thread 1105562544 (LWP 6103)]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...0xffffe410 in ?? ()

+ Trace 50094

#0 ??
#1 ??
#2 ??
#3 ??
#4 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#5 libgnomeui_segv_handle
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#6 segv_redirect
#7 <signal handler called>
#8 gtk_widget_get_accessible
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#9 html_utils_get_accessible
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
#10 gtk_html_a11y_ref_child
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
#11 atk_object_ref_accessible_child
from /opt/gnome/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0
#12 spi_atk_bridge_signal_listener
from /opt/gnome/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libatk-bridge.so
#13 signal_emit_unlocked_R
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 g_signal_emit_valist
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 g_signal_emit_by_name
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 gail_container_real_remove_gtk
from /opt/gnome/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgail.so
#17 gail_container_remove_gtk
from /opt/gnome/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgail.so
#18 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 g_closure_invoke
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 signal_emit_unlocked_R
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 g_signal_emit_valist
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 g_signal_emit
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#23 gtk_container_remove
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 destroy
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
#25 destroy
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
#26 html_object_destroy
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
#27 destroy
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
#28 destroy
from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
#29 ??
#30 ??
#31 g_malloc
from /opt/gnome/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0




Unknown reporter: rodrigo.flores@icisa.com.mx, changed to bugbuddy-import@ximian.com.
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 Gerardo Marin 2004-09-14 00:19:19 UTC

Actualiza tu Evolution

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 242867 ***