Bug 263506 – crash on sending mail

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 263506 - crash on sending mail


Summary:	crash on sending mail


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 243160

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	Mailer
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	Normal normal
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Evolution Triage Team
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2004-08-19 23:41 UTC by Sean Middleditch
Modified:	2004-08-23 19:57 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	---

Description Sean Middleditch 2004-08-19 23:41:26 UTC

Distribution: Fedora Core release Rawhide (Rawhide)
Package: Evolution
Priority: Normal
Version: GNOME2.7.91 unspecified
Gnome-Distributor: Red Hat, Inc
Synopsis: crash on sending mail
Bugzilla-Product: Evolution
Bugzilla-Component: Mailer
Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.7.2)
Description:
Description of the crash:

Whenever I try to compose a message, either an original or a reply, I
get a crash.  The crash happens immediately on trying to send, and also
occurs if I just leave the compose window open for a while (range of 20
seconds to a couple minutes).  No crashes occur while just
reading/browsing messages.


Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -171743392 (LWP 1491)]
[New Thread -293258320 (LWP 1992)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -171743392 (LWP 1491)]
[New Thread -293258320 (LWP 1992)]
[New Thread -278733904 (LWP 1964)]
[New Thread -268244048 (LWP 1963)]
[New Thread -243848272 (LWP 1513)]
[New Thread -233342032 (LWP 1511)]
[New Thread -222454864 (LWP 1499)]
[New Thread -211903568 (LWP 1497)]
[New Thread -201253968 (LWP 1496)]
[New Thread -190764112 (LWP 1494)]
[New Thread -180274256 (LWP 1493)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -171743392 (LWP 1491)]
[New Thread -293258320 (LWP 1992)]
0xf6fe9782 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2

+ Trace 49483

Thread 11 (Thread -180274256 (LWP 1493))

#0 _dl_sysinfo_int80
from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#1 pthread_cond_wait
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#2 e_msgport_wait
at e-msgport.c line 511
#3 thread_dispatch
at e-msgport.c line 874
#4 start_thread
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#5 clone
from /lib/tls/libc.so.6

Thread 10 (Thread -190764112 (LWP 1494))

#0 _dl_sysinfo_int80
from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#1 pthread_cond_wait
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#2 e_msgport_wait
at e-msgport.c line 511
#3 thread_dispatch
at e-msgport.c line 874
#4 start_thread
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#5 clone
from /lib/tls/libc.so.6

Thread 9 (Thread -201253968 (LWP 1496))

#0 _dl_sysinfo_int80
from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#1 pthread_cond_wait
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#2 e_msgport_wait
at e-msgport.c line 511
#3 thread_dispatch
at e-msgport.c line 874
#4 start_thread
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#5 clone
from /lib/tls/libc.so.6

Thread 8 (Thread -211903568 (LWP 1497))

#0 _dl_sysinfo_int80
from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#1 pthread_cond_wait
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#2 e_msgport_wait
at e-msgport.c line 511
#3 thread_dispatch
at e-msgport.c line 874
#4 start_thread
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#5 clone
from /lib/tls/libc.so.6

Thread 7 (Thread -222454864 (LWP 1499))

#0 _dl_sysinfo_int80
from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#1 ___newselect_nocancel
from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#2 camel_gethostbyname
at camel-service.c line 755
#3 camel_header_msgid_generate
at camel-mime-utils.c line 3772
#4 camel_mime_message_set_message_id
at camel-mime-message.c line 261
#5 write_to_stream
at camel-mime-message.c line 507
#6 camel_data_wrapper_write_to_stream
at camel-data-wrapper.c line 168
#7 local_summary_add
at camel-local-summary.c line 451
#8 mbox_summary_add
at camel-mbox-summary.c line 1005
#9 camel_local_summary_add
at camel-local-summary.c line 299
#10 mbox_append_message
at camel-mbox-folder.c line 275
#11 camel_folder_append_message
at camel-folder.c line 685
#12 append_mail_append
at mail-ops.c line 813
#13 mail_msg_received
at mail-mt.c line 556
#14 thread_dispatch
at e-msgport.c line 826
#15 start_thread
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#16 clone
from /lib/tls/libc.so.6

Thread 6 (Thread -233342032 (LWP 1511))

#0 _dl_sysinfo_int80
from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#1 pthread_cond_wait
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#2 e_msgport_wait
at e-msgport.c line 511
#3 thread_dispatch
at e-msgport.c line 874
#4 start_thread
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#5 clone
from /lib/tls/libc.so.6

Thread 5 (Thread -243848272 (LWP 1513))

#0 _dl_sysinfo_int80
from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#1 pthread_cond_wait
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#2 e_msgport_wait
at e-msgport.c line 511
#3 thread_dispatch
at e-msgport.c line 874
#4 start_thread
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#5 clone
from /lib/tls/libc.so.6

Thread 4 (Thread -268244048 (LWP 1963))

#0 _dl_sysinfo_int80
from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#1 poll
from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#2 g_main_context_acquire
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#3 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#4 startup_mainloop
at e-book.c line 3247
#5 start_thread
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#6 clone
from /lib/tls/libc.so.6

Thread 3 (Thread -278733904 (LWP 1964))

#0 _dl_sysinfo_int80
from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#1 poll
from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#2 g_main_context_acquire
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#3 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#4 link_thread_io_context
from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
#5 ??
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#6 ??
#7 g_static_private_free
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#0 _dl_sysinfo_int80
from /lib/ld-linux.so.2




Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 Gerardo Marin 2004-08-23 19:57:07 UTC

Upgrade glibc

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 243160 ***