After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 244881 - No message filter log
No message filter log
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 216247
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
pre-1.5 (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: Future
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
evolution[filters]
: 240930 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-06-16 09:11 UTC by Joerg Sievers
Modified: 2004-12-15 18:42 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement


Description Joerg Sievers 2003-06-16 09:11:50 UTC 
If incoming mails are deleted by a message filter, there is no possibility
to find out about this, since the filtering process can’t be analyzed
later. For an automatically working feature that can destroy data, this is
a must!
Comment 1 Joerg Sievers 2003-06-16 12:34:26 UTC 
Added keyword 'filters'
Comment 2 Jeffrey Stedfast 2003-06-16 13:50:32 UTC 
you can actually configure evo to log, but you have to edit the gconf
keys yourself

there is no gui for it...


anna: is this intentional? or did you/we just forget?

either way I see no reason to add this to 1.4.x
Comment 3 Anna Marie Dirks 2003-06-16 20:21:32 UTC 
I believe that adding a message filter log is in the list of mailer
feature improvements for 1.6. 

As to why this does not exist now, I woudln't know -- presumably lack
of resources to implement it given the deadlines we were trying to
meet, or something. 

So, yeah, adding this is planned. :) 

Interface wise, the most similar existing gnome tool is
"redhat-logviewer". Joerg, are you familiar with this tool? (Probably
not, if you're using Solaris, eh?) If you are familiar with it, do you
think that a user interface similar to that one would be appropriate? 

-Anna
Comment 4 Gerardo Marin 2003-06-19 01:23:42 UTC 
*** bug 240930 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Gerardo Marin 2003-11-30 09:05:38 UTC 
Moving all 2.0 milestones to 1.5.x, please retarget if needed.
Comment 6 Not Zed 2003-12-02 04:57:58 UTC 
this would fall into 'new features' right, which we've hit a freeze on
for 2.0
Comment 7 Gerardo Marin 2003-12-02 22:44:20 UTC 
Futuring, then.
Comment 8 Rodney Dawes 2004-12-15 18:42:26 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 216247 ***