After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 233774 - LDAP contacts Free/Busy URL ignored
LDAP contacts Free/Busy URL ignored
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 231967
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Calendar
pre-1.5 (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 241236 246449 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-11-12 19:33 UTC by Nic Benders
Modified: 2013-09-10 14:03 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
openldap schema for RFC 2739 (1.45 KB, text/plain)
2002-11-12 19:34 UTC, Nic Benders 		Details

Description Nic Benders 2002-11-12 19:33:23 UTC 
Description of Problem:
Free/Busy URL is not checked for LDAP contacts

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Load an RFC 2739 schema into the ldap server
2. Edit the Free/Busy URL field for the contact on the LDAP server
3. Create a Meeting and Invite that contact from the LDAP server
4. Go to scheduling

Actual Results:
No Information available.  The web server logs also show no activity for
that url.

Expected Results:
The free/busy information should be loaded by gnome-vfs from the url.


How often does this happen? 
Always.

Additional Information:
This works for contacts in the local contacts store.  Also, if there is a
contact of the same name as the LDAP contact in the local store, it's (the
local) Free/Busy URL will be consulted.

The RFC2739 LDAP schema that I created can be found here:
http://people.pinpoint.com/~benders/rfc2739.schema
Comment 1 Nic Benders 2002-11-12 19:34:07 UTC 
Created attachment 41723 [details]
openldap schema for RFC 2739
Comment 2 Rodney Dawes 2003-04-12 21:22:03 UTC 
This is probably related to the lack of webcal: and viewing/publishing
f/b info at a remote address. Adding myself to the cc: as I'm going to
look at the webcal: stuff for 1.6.
Comment 3 Oli Kessler 2004-01-21 13:46:52 UTC 
*** bug 246449 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Oli Kessler 2004-01-21 13:47:59 UTC 
*** bug 241236 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Nic Benders 2004-01-21 20:38:10 UTC 
I have confirmed that this still occurs in Evolution 1.4.5.  I have
also applied an updated version of the RFC 2739 schema for OpenLDAP.

This problem might also be in the LDAP Contact system. However it
appears that the calendar is just doing a simple text match for the
email address of the meeting attendant against the local contact
store, and is not actually attempting to pull information from the
attendant selected in the dialog at all.
Comment 6 JP Rosevear 2004-09-30 22:30:47 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 231967 ***