After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 233399 - PO Box information not saved in contacts
PO Box information not saved in contacts
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 257802
Product: Evolution Exchange
Classification: Deprecated
Component: Connector
1.1.x
Other other
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: Connector Maintainer
Ximian Connector QA
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-11-06 22:17 UTC by Daniel Collins
Modified: 2004-09-14 09:09 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Daniel Collins 2002-11-06 22:17:37 UTC 
Please fill in this template when reporting a bug, unless you know what you
are doing.
Description of Problem:
(not sure if this an addressbook (i.e. Evolution) or Connector issue).
When entering an address with a PO box, the information is deleted when the
contact is saved.

This happens in Connector 1.0.7/Evolution 1.0.8 as well

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Create a contact with a PO (or P.O.) Box in the first line of the address
2. Save the contact
3. Notice that the PO box disappears from the contact. Open the contact to
verify and the PO box doesn't appear at all.

Actual Results:


Expected Results:
PO Box line should be saved.

How often does this happen? 
All the time.

Additional Information:
Comment 1 christine 2003-03-17 19:02:19 UTC 
Danw:  - is this easy to fix? aka 1.4?
Comment 2 Dan Winship 2003-03-31 20:00:26 UTC 
Chris, I want your advice since I know you've been doing some other
address-parsing stuff.

The problem is that we're storing the PO Box data in the "PO Box"
field in Exchange, but Outlook does not display that field. ! So
we should probably store it somewhere else (extra?) but I'm not
sure exactly where/how...
Comment 3 Dan Winship 2004-08-31 14:47:19 UTC 
Toshok: poke poke! Please advise...
Comment 4 Sushma Rai 2004-09-14 09:09:38 UTC 
See the comments on 57802, about not storing PO Box information.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 257802 ***