After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 230205 - Cannot perform any field contains query in GAL
Cannot perform any field contains query in GAL
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 260404
Product: Evolution Exchange
Classification: Deprecated
Component: Connector
1.1.x
Other All
: Normal minor
: 2.1
Assigned To: Connector Maintainer
Ximian Connector QA
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-09-11 20:46 UTC by Tim Lee
Modified: 2005-03-29 10:11 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Tim Lee 2002-09-11 20:46:02 UTC 
Please fill in this template when reporting a bug, unless you know what you
are doing.
Description of Problem:
When trying an "Any field contain query" in the GAL folder get the
following worning and the query is not performed:

  The backend for this address book refused to perform this query.

"Any field.." query works in Exchange contacts folder and ldap.ximian.com.


How often does this happen? 
Everytime

Additional Information:
Machine Configuration
------------------------------------------------------------------
Linux tlee 2.4.7-10 #1 Thu Sep 6 17:27:27 EDT 2001 i686 unknown
soup-0.7.8-1.ximian.1
libgtkhtml20-1.0.4-2.ximian.1
libgal19-0.19.3-1.ximian.3
libgal20-0.20-0.ximian.1
gtkhtml1.1-1.1.2-0.ximian.1
gal-0.20-0.ximian.1
evolution-1.1.1-0.ximian.1
ximian-connector-1.1.1-0.ximian.1
Comment 1 Dan Winship 2002-09-11 20:58:44 UTC 
That's not a bug, it's a feature. See http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=25782.
Comment 2 Tim Lee 2002-09-18 15:04:26 UTC 
Can we disable "Any field contains" searches for the GAL or at least
provide a better error message. For example:

 "This type of query is not permitted for this addressbook"

If not possible at this point for 1.2, then please change milestone to
1.4.
Comment 3 Sushma Rai 2005-03-29 10:11:35 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 260404 ***