After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 229844 - If a view isn't editable, the "Edit" button should be desensitized
If a view isn't editable, the "Edit" button should be desensitized
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 240762
Product: GAL
Classification: Deprecated
Component: GalView
trunk
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Radek Doulik
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-09-03 22:27 UTC by Joe Shaw
Modified: 2005-10-21 15:48 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Joe Shaw 2002-09-03 22:27:50 UTC 
In the addressbook, if I bring up the "define views" dialog box, I am
listed three default views: Address Cards, Phone List, By Company.

If I select the Phone List or By Company view, I can click on the "Edit"
button and edit it.  When I click on the Address Cards view and click
"Edit", however, nothing happens.  Also, if I copy it and try to edit the
copied view, nothing happens.

If a view isn't editable (as it appears that Address Cards isn't), then the
"Edit" button should be  desensitized rather than doing nothing.
Comment 1 Jeffrey Stedfast 2004-06-11 20:06:43 UTC 
is this still the case? I'm not sure how to reproduce... (just trying
to clean out the bugs filed under gal, most of them are old cruft that
no longer apply)
Comment 2 Joe Shaw 2004-06-11 20:19:20 UTC 
Yes, this is still an issue.

Go to the contacts view, go to Edit -> Define views

You should have (at least) 3: Address Cards, Phone List, and By Company.

If you click on "Edit" when Address Cards is selected, nothing
happens.  It should be grayed out then.  You can edit Phone List and
By Company.

(I also just noticed that the underscores for the accelerators are
there... i wonder if this is intentional (and rather esoteric) or
whether it's a bug)
Comment 3 André Klapper 2005-10-21 01:42:08 UTC 
hmm... joe, is this a duplicate of bug 240762 (because that one got patches)?

the underscores issue is bug 274451, by the way.
Comment 4 Joe Shaw 2005-10-21 15:48:07 UTC 
Yes, this appears to be a duplicate of that bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 240762 ***