After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 226944 - evolution and gnupg related problem
evolution and gnupg related problem
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 217540
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
pre-1.5 (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal blocker
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-06-25 10:47 UTC by Jakub Safar
Modified: 2002-06-25 17:45 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Jakub Safar 2002-06-25 10:47:27 UTC
Description of Problem:

evolution reported that message was not signed correctly with gpg despite
the fact, that when i manually saved the message, gpg verified it without a
problem (command "gpg --verify")

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. get this email in the evolution

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Cau

setkali jsme se spolu minuly tyden v pondeli na jabber meeting :-). Mohl by 
jsi mi prosim napsat nazev te objektove databaze?

			Diky
- -- 
                                  Petr "Fers" Ferschmann

 -=[  petr@ferschmann.cz  ]==[ http://petr.ferschmann.cz/ ]=-
- -=[ Koukni na http://www.postcard.cz/ ]==[ +420 604/781 009 ]=-

GPG Fingerprint:
[83B0 6378 7A9D D993 035E  60BD FEEC F665 D2C8 1B9A]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9GCyP/uz2ZdLIG5oRAvdBAJ9PXUR5C9dLGyCKU7V6PR0AUf/sMgCfabEM
+uPupGIYOn58U8osKiPtfT4=
=Th3T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2. 

get the gpg signature of Petr. (gnupg --recv-key D2C81B9A)

3. 

take a look at evolution, whether it verifies the signature or no.

Actual Results:

Evolution reports "bad signature from ..."

Expected Results:

Report "good signature from ..."

How often does this happen? 

any time message is opened

Additional Information:
Comment 1 Jeffrey Stedfast 2002-06-25 17:45:58 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 217540 ***