After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 218872 - adding new rss feed crashes executive-summary
adding new rss feed crashes executive-summary
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 218603
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Do Not Use
unspecified
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Iain
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-01-18 02:13 UTC by siffert
Modified: 2013-09-13 12:31 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description siffert 2002-01-18 02:16:25 UTC
Package: Evolution
Priority: Normal
Version: 1.0.1
Synopsis: adding new rss feed crashes executive-summary
Bugzilla-Product: Evolution
Bugzilla-Component: Summary [was My Evolution]

Description:
I tried adding http://blog.mattgoyer.com/rss.xml as a newsfeed and it
crashed.  It's an rss file generated by Manila Radio, which is blogging
software - lots of websites use it to generate their RSS feeds.  Maybe
it's malformed, but if so maybe it should catch the error more
gracefully.  To fix it I have to edit the config files directly before I
restart evolution.



Debugging Information:

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 1024 (LWP 5234)]
[New Thread 2049 (LWP 5273)]
[New Thread 1026 (LWP 5274)]
[New Thread 2051 (LWP 5275)]
[New Thread 3076 (LWP 5276)]
[New Thread 4101 (LWP 5277)]
[New Thread 5126 (LWP 5278)]
[New Thread 6151 (LWP 5279)]
[New Thread 7176 (LWP 5280)]
[New Thread 8201 (LWP 5281)]
[New Thread 9226 (LWP 5282)]
[New Thread 10251 (LWP 5283)]
[New Thread 11276 (LWP 5284)]
[New Thread 12301 (LWP 5285)]
[New Thread 13326 (LWP 5286)]
[New Thread 14351 (LWP 5287)]
[New Thread 15376 (LWP 5288)]
[New Thread 16401 (LWP 5289)]
[New Thread 17426 (LWP 5290)]
0x41017509 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 __check_rhosts_file
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #2 waitpid
    at wrapsyscall.c line 172
  • #3 gnome_icon_entry_get_type
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui.so.32
  • #4 killpg
    from /lib/libc.so.6

Comment 1 israel 2002-01-18 19:38:30 UTC
Unfortunately, through no fault of your own, this trace is pretty
useless. If you can reproduce this crash with a specific set of
actions, please let us know, and please keep submitting traces- the
next one may be the one that helps us fix the bug. Thanks!
Comment 2 siffert 2002-01-18 19:51:13 UTC
Well, every time I've tried adding this particular feed, it crashes,
and has done so back since version 0.14 (or whatever the one was
before we leaped forward to 0.99).  I have not tried adding any other
rss feeds from scratch because I haven't found any other ones I like.
 So it's possible that if you tried adding the same feed, it might
crash for you too.  If not, it's probably another frustrating mandrake
library conflict that won't get fixed until I wipe the hard drive and
reinstall...
Comment 3 israel 2002-01-19 01:22:06 UTC
I repeat the process that you do and i get a worng RDF, then when i
click on the tool button to delete it, evo crash and i get this:

(no debugging symbols found)...0x40dbe669 in ?? ()
  • #0 ??
  • #1 ??
  • #2 ??
  • #3 ??
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 e_summary_rdf_get_html
  • #6 TC_GNOME_Evolution_MailFilter_struct
  • #7 e_summary_rdf_get_html
  • #8 e_summary_rdf_get_html
  • #9 ??
  • #10 ??
  • #11 ??
  • #12 ??
  • #13 ??
  • #14 ??
  • #15 ??
  • #16 ??
  • #17 metar_init_re
  • #18 ??
  • #0 ??
  • #1 ??
  • #2 ??
  • #3 ??
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 e_summary_rdf_get_html
  • #6 TC_GNOME_Evolution_MailFilter_struct
  • #7 e_summary_rdf_get_html

i'm using evo 1.0.0.99
Guys, any ideas?
Comment 4 israel 2002-02-05 19:07:38 UTC
I'm going to mark this as DUP of #18603 because it has a beter stacktrace.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 218603 ***