After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 216619 - Going "offline" kills summary
Going "offline" kills summary
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 217249
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Do Not Use
pre-1.5 (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Iain
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-12-05 08:53 UTC by Ben FrantzDale
Modified: 2013-09-13 12:31 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Ben FrantzDale 2001-12-05 08:53:13 UTC 
Please fill in this template when reporting a bug, unless you know what you
are doing.
Description of Problem:
Clicking on the online/offline toggle button in the bottom left of the
window has twice in a row killed the summary component, the two backtraces
were the same (except for memory addresses, of course)

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Click the "offline" toggle button

Actual Results:
Summary crashes, evolution refuses to go offline thereafter and the summary
doesn't work.

Expected Results:
Evolution should go offline.


How often does this happen? 
Every time

Additional Information:


0x40a64e39 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6

+ Trace 14613

  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 __check_rhosts_file
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #2 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 gnome_segv_handle
    at gnome-init.c line 659
  • #4 pthread_kill
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #5 sigaction
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #6 e_summary_offline_handler_create_connection_list
    at e-summary-offline-handler.c line 53
  • #7 impl_prepareForOffline
    at e-summary-offline-handler.c line 97
  • #8 _ORBIT_skel_GNOME_Evolution_Offline_prepareForOffline
    at Evolution-skels.c line 3091
  • #9 ORBit_POA_handle_request
    at orbit_poa.c line 513
  • #10 ORBit_handle_incoming_request
    at server.c line 90
  • #11 ORBit_handle_incoming_message
    at server.c line 160
  • #12 giop_main_handle_connection
    at connection.c line 1214
  • #13 orb_handle_connection
    at oaf-mainloop.c line 70
  • #14 g_io_unix_dispatch
    at giounix.c line 135
  • #15 g_main_dispatch
    at gmain.c line 656
  • #16 g_main_iterate
    at gmain.c line 877
  • #17 g_main_run
    at gmain.c line 935
  • #18 gtk_main
    at gtkmain.c line 524
  • #19 bonobo_main
    at bonobo-main.c line 283
  • #20 main
    at main.c line 80
  • #21 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 __check_rhosts_file
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #2 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 gnome_segv_handle
    at gnome-init.c line 659
  • #4 pthread_kill
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #5 sigaction
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #6 e_summary_offline_handler_create_connection_list
    at e-summary-offline-handler.c line 53
  • #7 impl_prepareForOffline
    at e-summary-offline-handler.c line 97 






Comment 1


Luis Villa





          2001-12-14 16:19:15 UTC
        



iain: is this bug 217249?






Comment 2


Ben FrantzDale





          2001-12-14 22:19:49 UTC
        



It sure looke like 17249 is a duplicate of this one. The backtraces
are somewhat different between the two, but pretty similar.






Comment 3


Iain





          2001-12-15 01:10:47 UTC
        



Yeah, I think it is.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 217249 ***