After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 216327 - message priority not recognized or settable
message priority not recognized or settable
Status: RESOLVED NOTABUG
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
pre-1.5 (obsolete)
Other other
: Normal enhancement
: Future
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 205812 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-12-01 00:36 UTC by Adam Cappio
Modified: 2005-04-10 08:16 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Adam Cappio 2001-12-01 00:36:00 UTC
Description of Problem: 
Messages with X-Priority set in the header should have some visual
indication of relative priority.  Also, it would be nice to be able to set
this property when composing messages.

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Send message from another mail client which sets X-Priority header with
priority set to "high" or "highest"
2. Receive message with Evolution

Actual Results:
Message is indistinguishable from other messages of lower priority.

Expected Results:
I would expect the message to have some visual clue about its priority.


How often does this happen? 
Always

Additional Information:
Comment 1 Jeffrey Stedfast 2001-12-02 00:50:55 UTC
*sigh*...the problem with "priority" is that there is no standard for
it.

some mail clients support it, others don't.

for the ones that do support it, they might use a different format.

I think Mozilla uses X-Priority while MS Outlook uses X-MSPriority or
something - what does Lotus Notes use? What does Novell GroupWise use?
There are plenty of other popular mail clients too - what do they use
if anything? And that's only comparing the header fields... I have
*no* idea what the values are defined to be. The only way I can think
of to find out is to go out and buy all of the popular mail clients
and do some trial and error action.

there could be an infinite array of possible ways of doing "priority".

I personally feel we shouldn't waste our time, priority is pretty
meaningless anyway. What gives someone else the right to flag
something as important when sending email to me? Shouldn't *I* be the
one to decide if it's important or not? The biggest problem I see with
priority (the pain I experienced at my last job) was that people start
flagging damn near everything as important and the next thing you
know, priority has lost it's intended usefullness.

marking as future for now -we can decide whether to implement this at
some later date.
Comment 2 aaron 2002-05-22 22:28:19 UTC
What Exchange does is this:

X-Priority: 1
Priority: Urgent
Importance: high	
Comment 3 aaron 2002-05-22 22:28:28 UTC
*** bug 205812 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Jeffrey Stedfast 2002-05-27 08:01:29 UTC
this is a duplicate.
Comment 5 Peter Fuchs 2005-04-10 08:16:36 UTC
Could you please let me know if there was some progress for this feature? After
updating from Evolution 1.x to 2.0.2 this seems to be the only real feature
missing for me.