After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 215972 - Evolution claims BAD signature when it isn't
Evolution claims BAD signature when it isn't
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 215787
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
pre-1.5 (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal blocker
: Future
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 217319 219660 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-11-24 18:27 UTC by scott
Modified: 2002-02-27 20:11 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Signed message that evolution fails on (2.39 KB, text/plain)
2001-11-25 12:46 UTC, Scott James Remnant 		Details

Description scott 2001-11-24 18:27:14 UTC 
Package: Evolution
Priority: Normal
Version: 0.99.2
Synopsis: Evolution claims BAD signature when it isn't
Bugzilla-Product: Evolution
Bugzilla-Component: Mailer

Description:
I've received a number of messages signed with PGP, my Evolution is
configured to
use GPG (output of --version below) and claims the mail has a bad
signature.  Yet if I save the message and pass it through gpg as normal,
it says the message is fine.

monkey scott% gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 1.0.6
Copyright (C) 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions. See the file COPYING for details.

Home: ~/.gnupg
Supported algorithms:
Cipher: 3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, RIJNDAEL, RIJNDAEL192, RIJNDAEL256,
TWOFISH
Pubkey: RSA, RSA-E, RSA-S, ELG-E, DSA, ELG
Hash: MD5, SHA1, RIPEMD160



Unknown reporter: scott@netsplit.com, changed to bugbuddy-import@ximian.com.
Comment 1 Scott James Remnant 2001-11-25 12:46:49 UTC 
Created attachment 40710 [details]
Signed message that evolution fails on
Comment 2 Luis Villa 2001-12-18 16:08:56 UTC 
Is this a duplicate of the other recent pgp problems, jeff?
Comment 3 Jeffrey Stedfast 2001-12-18 21:25:37 UTC 
well, it's not a dup of skvidal's bug (that one is a pgp/mime message)
this one is a in-line pgp message. I think this is a duplicate of
another in-line pgp bug tho that I wrote a patch for that looped over
a ton of possible variations of the message formatting until it
verified but I could be wrong.
Comment 4 Jeffrey Stedfast 2002-01-04 19:20:42 UTC 
*** bug 217319 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Jeffrey Stedfast 2002-01-04 19:21:33 UTC 
this is already fixed for 1.0 iirc.
Comment 6 Scott James Remnant 2002-01-04 22:50:07 UTC 
I've upgraded to 1.0 and it still fails, I'm afraid :(
Comment 7 Jeffrey Stedfast 2002-01-04 23:07:33 UTC 
I meant 1.0.2, sorry.
Comment 8 Scott James Remnant 2002-01-31 12:24:16 UTC 
Just installed 1.0.2 and evolution still claims this mail has a bad 
signature, but piping it through GPG says it's a good one.

:(
Comment 9 israel 2002-01-31 18:39:24 UTC 
*** bug 219660 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Jeffrey Stedfast 2002-02-27 20:11:22 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 215787 ***