After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 214535 - Summary page Tasks-- lists tasks in the top folder
Summary page Tasks-- lists tasks in the top folder
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 205053
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Do Not Use
unspecified
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Iain
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks: 216098
 
 
Reported: 2001-11-05 20:52 UTC by Mike Petersen
Modified: 2013-09-13 12:28 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement


Description Mike Petersen 2001-11-05 20:50:22 UTC 
Package: Evolution
Priority: Minor
Version: 0.16
Synopsis: Summary page Tasks-- lists tasks in the top folder
Bugzilla-Product: Evolution
Bugzilla-Component: Summary [was My Evolution]

Description:
If your tasks are organized in folders-- and not placed in the top level
Tasks folder -- the summary page reports 'No Tasks.'  

I don't find a way to change the behavior in the Summary Settings
dialog.



Unknown reporter: mikep@earthnet.net, changed to bugbuddy-import@ximian.com.
Comment 1 Luis Villa 2001-11-05 21:03:10 UTC 
There isn't one, really. Iain: how easy/not easy would this be to add
(for post-1.0, of course.)
Comment 2 Iain 2001-11-19 18:36:17 UTC 
Shouldn't actually be too hard.
Would just be a case of adding the same things as the mailer has "Show
tasks in these folders".
Comment 3 Luis Villa 2001-11-26 17:05:04 UTC 
Because of the decision to remap 1.1->1.2 and 1.2->1.4, I'm going to be
moving a large number of bugs around in the bugzilla. You can just
search on 'body contains' 'Because of the decision to remap' and mark
all as read. Please direct all questions about this change to
evolution@ximian.com, not the bug.
Luis
Comment 4 Iain 2001-12-06 16:38:46 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 205053 ***