After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 207295 - Winmail.dat Attachments
Winmail.dat Attachments
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 200232
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: Ettore Perazzoli
Evolution QA team
: 211641 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-08-15 06:40 UTC by Gordon Staines
Modified: 2013-09-10 14:02 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Gordon Staines 2001-08-15 06:40:53 UTC 
Many users sending attachments from MS OutLook 2000 (not Express) send attachments inside a winmail attachment.

Outlook 2000 is part of MS Office 2000

For example. If I drag a contact out of outlooks contacts into an email it end up in a winmail attachment. this is especially the case if the user is sending a RTF format email

I would love something under linux that can decode winmail attachments automatically 

Cheers


Gordon
Comment 1 Nat Friedman 2001-10-12 06:56:12 UTC 
This is, indeed, important functionality.  Not easy, thoguh.  Setting
this to 1.2.
Comment 2 Nat Friedman 2001-10-12 06:56:35 UTC 
Resetting it to 1.1 at Ettore's request.
Comment 3 Heath Harrelson 2001-10-25 15:25:09 UTC 
*** bug 211641 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Luis Villa 2001-11-26 17:03:59 UTC 
Because of the decision to remap 1.1->1.2 and 1.2->1.4, I'm going to be
moving a large number of bugs around in the bugzilla. You can just
search on 'body contains' 'Because of the decision to remap' and mark
all as read. Please direct all questions about this change to
evolution@ximian.com, not the bug.
Luis
Comment 5 Luis Villa 2001-11-27 20:14:30 UTC 
Bumping in keeping with the TNEF and S/MIME prioritizations.
Comment 6 Dan Winship 2001-12-06 03:10:48 UTC 
This is a duplicate of 232 which is also marked 1.2

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 200232 ***