After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 172338 - hicolor icon theme
hicolor icon theme
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 172337
Product: gnome-control-center
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.10.x
Other All
: Normal blocker
: ---
Assigned To: Control-Center Maintainers
Control-Center Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-04-01 09:13 UTC by Surya Kiran
Modified: 2005-04-01 10:21 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10



Description Surya Kiran 2005-04-01 09:13:32 UTC
Please describe the problem:
Hi, 
I've recently upgraded gnome from 2.8 to 2.10, Both were installed in different 
directories, and i've deleted the old one. Installation went thru fine. But what ever 
application i'm running (for eg. gconf-editor), i'm getting an error on the console saying 
hicolor icon theme is not installed. 

===================== 
(gconf-editor:13071): Gtk-WARNING **: Could not find the icon 'stock_add-bookmark'. The 
'hicolor' theme 
was not found either, perhaps you need to install it. 
You can get a copy from: 
http://freedesktop.org/Software/icon-theme/releases 

for gnome-font-properties

(gnome-font-properties:27606): Gtk-WARNING **: Could not find the icon 
'gnome-settings-font'. The 'hicolor' theme
was not found either, perhaps you need to install it.
You can get a copy from:
        http://freedesktop.org/Software/icon-theme/releases
===================== 

But I've installed hicolor icon theme and also gnome-themes. before installing 
gconf-editor. 

I'm getting this kind of error with every gnome application. 
And worst of all when i try to run control-center, all i'm getting is a blank wiindow with 
white background. 

I've never faced such kind of problems with gnome-2.8 

Somebody please help me.

Steps to reproduce:
1. 
2. 
3. 


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:
Comment 1 Sebastien Bacher 2005-04-01 10:21:54 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 172337 ***