After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 167732 - Fonts in folder view being scaled according to Icon View zoom level
Fonts in folder view being scaled according to Icon View zoom level
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 160080
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: Navigation
2.9.x
Other All
: Normal trivial
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
: 167726 168855 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-02-17 19:37 UTC by Jeremy Tan
Modified: 2005-03-02 00:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10


Description Jeremy Tan 2005-02-17 19:37:28 UTC 
Please describe the problem:
I set my Icon view to the zoom level of 75% and I use and Application font size of 8 with the 
Bitstream Vera Sans 8. The problem lies in that when I set it to a zoom level of 75%, the fonts that 
are used for the file/folder names get scaled down also. This makes all the fonts very Tiny. This 
didn't happen in 2.8

Steps to reproduce:
1. Set font size in the Font Preferences to Bitstream vera sans 8
2. Change Icon view zoom level to 75%
3. Open any nautilus window


Actual results:
Fonts in folder view becomes very very small.

Expected results:
Fonts size remains the same as the other applications

Does this happen every time?
Yes. With every font and every desktop themes

Other information:
I'm willing to provide sceenshots if you are interested
Comment 1 Paolo Borelli 2005-02-17 20:44:06 UTC 
*** Bug 167726 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Sebastien Bacher 2005-02-25 23:24:32 UTC 
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into
our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 160080 ***
Comment 3 Sebastien Bacher 2005-03-02 00:47:25 UTC 
*** Bug 168855 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***