After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 167224 - downloading folders over ssh://server crashes nautilus
downloading folders over ssh://server crashes nautilus
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 153679
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: File and Folder Operations
2.8.x
Other other
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-02-13 02:04 UTC by grejigl-linux
Modified: 2005-03-01 01:44 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.7/2.8



Description grejigl-linux 2005-02-13 02:04:31 UTC
Distribution: Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg)
Package: nautilus
Severity: normal
Version: GNOME2.8.1 unspecified
Gnome-Distributor: Gnome.org
Synopsis: downloading folders over ssh://server crashes nautilus
Bugzilla-Product: nautilus
Bugzilla-Component: File and Folder Operations
Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.8.0)
Description:
Description of the crash:
When trying to download folders from remote machine using ssh://
protocol nautilus crashes.

Steps to reproduce the crash:
1. Login to ssh server with Ctrl+L -> ssh://servername
2. copy some folders
3. After few Mb is transfered nautilus crashes

Expected Results:
everything get downloaded

How often does this happen?
Every time

Additional Information:
I used port forward through terminal (ssh -L 10001:remote_machine:22 
portal_to_remote_machine) then logged in on my localhost on port 10001
with nautilus when this happened


Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208142144 (LWP 15466)]
[New Thread -1222288464 (LWP 15473)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208142144 (LWP 15466)]
[New Thread -1222288464 (LWP 15473)]
[New Thread -1222022224 (LWP 15472)]
[New Thread -1221555280 (LWP 15471)]
[New Thread -1221289040 (LWP 15470)]
[New Thread -1221022800 (LWP 15469)]
[New Thread -1220756560 (LWP 15468)]
[New Thread -1210266704 (LWP 15467)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208142144 (LWP 15466)]
[New Thread -1222288464 (LWP 15473)]
0x009057a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2

Thread 8 (Thread -1210266704 (LWP 15467))

  • #0 _dl_sysinfo_int80
    from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  • #1 poll
    from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
  • #2 g_main_context_acquire
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 link_thread_io_context
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #5 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
  • #7 g_static_private_free
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2005-02-12 21:04 -------


Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other".
Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "nautilus".
   Setting to default milestone for this product, '---'
The original reporter of this bug does not have
   an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved
   it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
   Previous reporter was grejigl-linux@yahoo.ca.
Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED".
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 Martin Wehner 2005-03-01 01:44:59 UTC
Most likely a dup of bug 153679.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 153679 ***